dc.contributor.author | Newington, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Wells, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Adonis, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Bolton, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Bolton Saghdaoui, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Coffey, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Crow, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Fadeeva Costa, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Hughes, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Savage, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Shahabi, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Alexander, CM | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-22T11:37:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-31 | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-22T11:37:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Newington, L., Wells, M., Adonis, A. et al. A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine. BMC Health Serv Res 21, 400 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06354-y | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/94791 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: There are increasing opportunities for healthcare professionals outside medicine to be involved in and lead clinical research. However, there are few roles within these professions that include time for research. In order to develop such roles, and evaluate effective use of this time, the range of impacts of this clinical academic activity need to be valued and understood by healthcare leaders and managers. To date, these impacts have not been comprehensively explored, but are suggested to extend beyond traditional quantitative impact metrics, such as publications, citations and funding awards. METHODS: Ten databases, four grey literature repositories and a naïve web search engine were systematically searched for articles reporting impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine. Specifically, this did not include the direct impacts of the research findings, rather the impacts of the research activity. All stages of the review were performed by a minimum of two reviewers and reported impacts were categorised qualitatively according to a modified VICTOR (making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research) framework. RESULTS: Of the initial 2704 identified articles, 20 were eligible for inclusion. Identified impacts were mapped to seven themes: impacts for patients; impacts for the service provision and workforce; impacts to research profile, culture and capacity; economic impacts; impacts on staff recruitment and retention; impacts to knowledge exchange; and impacts to the clinical academic. CONCLUSIONS: Several overlapping sub-themes were identified across the main themes. These included the challenges and benefits of balancing clinical and academic roles, the creation and implementation of new evidence, and the development of collaborations and networks. These may be key areas for organisations to explore when looking to support and increase academic activity among healthcare professionals outside medicine. The modified VICTOR tool is a useful starting point for individuals and organisations to record the impact of their research activity. Further work is needed to explore standardised methods of capturing research impact that address the full range of impacts identified in this systematic review and are specific to the context of clinical academics outside medicine. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 400 - ? | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Health Serv Res | |
dc.rights | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Reprints and permissions | |
dc.subject | Allied health professions | en_US |
dc.subject | Clinical academics | en_US |
dc.subject | Midwifery | en_US |
dc.subject | Nursing | en_US |
dc.subject | Research impact | en_US |
dc.subject | Systematic review | en_US |
dc.subject | Thematic synthesis | en_US |
dc.subject | Delivery of Health Care | en_US |
dc.subject | Health Personnel | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Organizations | en_US |
dc.title | A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © The Author(s). 2021 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12913-021-06354-y | |
pubs.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926441 | en_US |
pubs.issue | 1 | en_US |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | en_US |
pubs.volume | 21 | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-03-31 | |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |