Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdams, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, GDen_US
dc.contributor.authorSadler, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorSobolev, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorSackley, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorSheehan, KJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T16:35:04Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/93010
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: to investigate physiotherapists' perspectives of effective community provision following hip fracture. METHODS: qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 community physiotherapists across England. Thematic analysis drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework identified barriers and facilitators to implementation of effective provision. Interviews were complemented by process mapping community provision in one London borough, to identify points of care where suggested interventions are in place and/or could be implemented. RESULTS: four themes were identified: ineffective coordination of care systems, ineffective patient stratification, insufficient staff recruitment and retention approaches and inhibitory fear avoidance behaviours. To enhance care coordination, participants suggested improving access to social services and occupational therapists, maximising multidisciplinary communication through online notation, extended physiotherapy roles, orthopaedic-specific roles and seven-day working. Participants advised the importance of stratifying patients on receipt of referrals, at assessment and into appropriately matched interventions. To mitigate insufficient staff recruitment and retention, participants proposed return-to-practice streams, apprenticeship schemes, university engagement, combined acute-community rotations and improving job description advertisements. To reduce effects of fear avoidance behaviour on rehabilitation, participants proposed the use of patient-specific goals, patient and carer education, staff education in psychological strategies or community psychologist access. Process mapping of one London borough identified points of care where suggested interventions to overcome barriers were in place and/or could be implemented. CONCLUSION: physiotherapists propose that effective provision of community physiotherapy following hip fracture could be improved by refining care coordination, utilising stratification techniques, employing enhanced recruitment and retainment strategies and addressing fear avoidance behaviours.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAge Ageingen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectallied health professionalen_US
dc.subjectfemoral neck fracturesen_US
dc.subjectolder peopleen_US
dc.subjectprocess mappingen_US
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectstratified careen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapistsen_US
dc.subjectHip Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectLondonen_US
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_US
dc.titlePhysiotherapists' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to effective community provision after hip fracture: a qualitative study in England.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/afad130en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37756647en_US
pubs.issue9en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume52en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States