Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuri, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorElgaeva, EEen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, FMKen_US
dc.contributor.authorFreidin, MBen_US
dc.contributor.authorVerzun, DAen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsepilov, YAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T10:15:02Z
dc.date.available2023-07-24en_US
dc.date.issued2023-08-04en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/90039
dc.description.abstractSTUDY DESIGN: Mendelian randomization (MR) study. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether antihypertensive medications (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors) and statins can be repurposed to prevent or treat spinal pain (back or neck pain). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Observational studies and a recent MR study have found associations between elevated blood pressure and greater risk of back pain. Observational studies have found associations between hyperlipidemia and statin use, and greater risk of back pain. No prior MR studies have examined the effects of antihypertensives or statins on spinal pain. METHODS: This was a two-sample MR study using publicly available summary statistics from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Sample sizes in exposure GWASs were n=757,601 (systolic blood pressure) and n=173,082 (low density lipoprotein[LDL] cholesterol), and n=1,028,947 for the outcome GWAS of spinal pain defined as health care seeking for any spinal pain-related diagnosis. Genes and cis-acting variants were identified as proxies for the drug targets of interest. MR analyses used inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis. The threshold for statistical significance after correction for multiple testing was P <0.0125. RESULTS: No statistically significant associations of these medications with spinal pain were found. However, findings were suggestive of a protective effect of beta blockers on spinal pain risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 0.98; P =0.03), and calcium channel blockers on greater spinal pain risk (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.24; P =0.02). CONCLUSIONS: A protective effect of beta-blockers on spinal pain was suggested in the current study, consistent with findings from observational studies of various other pain phenotypes. The detrimental effect of calcium channel blockers on spinal pain suggested in the current study must be interpreted in the context of conflicting directions of effect on non-spinal pain phenotypes in other observational studies.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSpine (Phila Pa 1976)en_US
dc.titleRepurposing Antihypertensive and Statin Medications for Spinal Pain: A Mendelian Randomization Study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BRS.0000000000004790en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37539717en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-07-24en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record