Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAcidi, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorGhallab, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorCotin, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorVibert, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorGolse, Nen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-25T09:39:07Z
dc.date.issued2023-04en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/85971
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: During an operation, augmented reality (AR) enables surgeons to enrich their vision of the operating field by means of digital imagery, particularly as regards tumors and anatomical structures. While in some specialties, this type of technology is routinely ustilized, in liver surgery due to the complexity of modeling organ deformities in real time, its applications remain limited. At present, numerous teams are attempting to find a solution applicable to current practice, the objective being to overcome difficulties of intraoperative navigation in an opaque organ. OBJECTIVE: To identify, itemize and analyze series reporting AR techniques tested in liver surgery, the objectives being to establish a state of the art and to provide indications of perspectives for the future. METHODS: In compliance with the PRISMA guidelines and availing ourselves of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, we identified English-language articles published between January 2020 and January 2022 corresponding to the following keywords: augmented reality, hepatic surgery, liver and hepatectomy. RESULTS: Initially, 102 titles, studies and summaries were preselected. Twenty-eight corresponding to the inclusion criteria were included, reporting on 183patients operated with the help of AR by laparotomy (n=31) or laparoscopy (n=152). Several techniques of acquisition and visualization were reported. Anatomical precision was the main assessment criterion in 19 articles, with values ranging from 3mm to 14mm, followed by time of acquisition and clinical feasibility. CONCLUSION: While several AR technologies are presently being developed, due to insufficient anatomical precision their clinical applications have remained limited. That much said, numerous teams are currently working toward their optimization, and it is highly likely that in the short term, the application of AR in liver surgery will have become more frequent and effective. As for its clinical impact, notably in oncology, it remains to be assessed.en_US
dc.format.extent118 - 126en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJ Visc Surgen_US
dc.subjectAugmented realityen_US
dc.subjectHepatectomyen_US
dc.subjectHepatic resectionen_US
dc.subjectHepatic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectAugmented Realityen_US
dc.subjectSurgery, Computer-Assisteden_US
dc.subjectHepatectomyen_US
dc.subjectSurgeonsen_US
dc.subjectLiveren_US
dc.titleAugmented reality in liver surgery.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.01.008en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36792394en_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume160en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record