Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarton, CJ
dc.contributor.authorDe Oliveira Silva, D
dc.contributor.authorMorton, S
dc.contributor.authorCollins, NJ
dc.contributor.authorRathleff, MS
dc.contributor.authorVicenzino, B
dc.contributor.authorvan Middelkoop, M
dc.contributor.authorCrossley, KM
dc.contributor.authorCallaghan, MJ
dc.contributor.authorSelfe, J
dc.contributor.authorHolden, S
dc.contributor.authorLack, S
dc.contributor.authorMacri, EM
dc.contributor.authorBazett-Jones, DM
dc.contributor.authorEarl-Boehm, JE
dc.contributor.authorRiel, H
dc.contributor.authorPowers, CM
dc.contributor.authorDavis, IS
dc.contributor.authorMorrissey, D
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T10:45:28Z
dc.date.available2021-05-24
dc.date.available2021-07-06T10:45:28Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-14
dc.identifier.citationBarton CJ, De Oliveira Silva D, Morton S, et al. REPORT-PFP: a consensus from the International Patellofemoral Research Network to improve REPORTing of quantitative PatelloFemoral Pain studies. British Journal of Sports Medicine. Published Online First: 14 June 2021. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103700en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/72900
dc.description.abstractPatellofemoral pain is a common and often debilitating musculoskeletal condition. Clinical translation and evidence synthesis of patellofemoral pain research are compromised by heterogenous and often inadequately reported study details. This consensus statement and associated checklist provides standards for REPORTing of quantitative PatelloFemoral Pain (REPORT-PFP) research to enhance clinical translation and evidence synthesis, and support clinician engagement with research and data collection. A three-stage Delphi process was initiated at the 2015 International Patellofemoral Research Network (iPFRN) retreat. An initial e-Delphi activity (n=24) generated topics and items, which were refined at the 2017 iPFRN retreat, and voted on prior to and following the 2019 iPFRN retreat (n=51 current and past retreat participants). Voting criteria included 'strongly recommended' (essential), 'recommended' (encouraged) and uncertain/unsure. An item was included in the checklist if ≥70% respondents voted 'recommended'. Items receiving ≥70% votes for 'strongly recommended' were labelled as such. The final REPORT-PFP checklist includes 31 items (11 strongly recommended, 20 recommended), covering (i) demographics (n=2,4); (ii) baseline symptoms and previous treatments (n=3,7); (iii) outcome measures (2,4); (iv) outcomes measure description (n=1,2); (v) clinical trial methodology (0,3) and (vi) reporting study results (n=3,0). The REPORT-PFP checklist is ready to be used by researchers and clinicians. Strong stakeholder engagement from clinical academics during development means consistent application by the international patellofemoral pain research community is likely. Checklist adherence will improve research accessibility for clinicians and enhance future evidence synthesis.en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
dc.subjectconsensusen_US
dc.subjectkneeen_US
dc.subjectknowledge translationen_US
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.titleREPORT-PFP: a consensus from the International Patellofemoral Research Network to improve REPORTing of quantitative PatelloFemoral Pain studies.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjsports-2020-103700
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127482en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-05-24
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record