dc.contributor.author | Parsons, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Griffin, XL | |
dc.contributor.author | Achten, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Costa, ML | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-24T16:03:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-24T16:03:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-03-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bone Joint Res 2014;3:69–75. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2046-3758 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/72031 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives
To study the measurement properties of a joint specific patient reported outcome measure, a measure of capability and a general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) tool in a large cohort of patients with a hip fracture.
Methods
Responsiveness and associations between the Oxford Hip Score (a hip specific measure: OHS), ICEpop CAPability (a measure of capability in older people: ICECAP-O) and EuroQol EQ-5D (general health-related quality of life measure: EQ-5D) were assessed using data available from two large prospective studies. The three outcome measures were assessed concurrently at a number of fixed follow-up time-points in a consecutive sequence of patients, allowing direct assessment of change from baseline, inter-measure associations and validity using a range of statistical methods.
Results
ICECAP-O was not responsive to change. EQ-5D was responsive to change from baseline, with an estimated standardised effect size for the two datasets of 0.676 and 0.644 at six weeks and four weeks respectively; this was almost as responsive to change as OHS (1.14 at four weeks). EQ-5D correlated strongly with OHS; Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.74, 0.77 and 0.70 at baseline, four weeks and four months. EQ-5D is a moderately good predictor of death at 12 months following hip fracture. Furthermore, EQ-5D reported by proxies (relatives and carers) behaves similarly to self-reported scores.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that a general HRQOL tool such as EQ-5D could be used to measure outcome for patients recovering from hip fracture, including those with cognitive impairment. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 69 - 75 | |
dc.publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | BONE & JOINT RESEARCH | |
dc.rights | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. | |
dc.subject | EQ-5D | en_US |
dc.subject | Oxford Hip Score | en_US |
dc.subject | Fragility Fractures | en_US |
dc.subject | Proximal Femur | en_US |
dc.subject | ICECAP-O | en_US |
dc.subject | Outcome assessment | en_US |
dc.title | Outcome assessment after hip fracture: is EQ-5D the answer? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2014 The author(s) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1302/2046-3758.33.2000250 | |
pubs.author-url | http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000344762700004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=612ae0d773dcbdba3046f6df545e9f6a | en_US |
pubs.issue | 3 | en_US |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Published | en_US |
pubs.publisher-url | http://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.33.2000250 | |
pubs.volume | 3 | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |