Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchmierer, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorGnanapavan, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorGiovannoni, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmoscato, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorHolden, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo-Loza, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorChristmas, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorBianchi, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorCalado-Marta, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T16:16:43Z
dc.date.available2020-07-20en_US
dc.date.issued2020-11en_US
dc.identifier.issn2332-7812en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/66820
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the use of CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurements in clinical practice as well as their effect on treatment strategies and outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Methods: This was an observational cohort study of MS patients who had a CSF NfL measurement between December 2015 and July 2018 as part of their routine clinical care. Treatment strategies were classified as ‘No Treatment/No Escalation’ (no treatment or no escalation of treatment) or ‘Treatment/Escalation’ (first-line injectable/oral disease-modifying therapies, highly-active disease-modifying therapies or treatment escalation). Change in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores was evaluated after 1-year follow-up. Results: Of 203 MS patients, 117 (58%) had relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Disease activity was most frequently indicated by elevated CSF NfL (n=85), followed by clinical (n=81) and MRI activity (n=65). CSF NfL measurements were independently associated with clinical (P=0.02) and MRI activity (P<0.001). Of those with elevated CSF NfL as the only evidence of disease activity (n=22), 77% had progressive MS (PMS). In PMS patients, 17 (20%) had elevated CSF NfL as the sole indicator of disease activity. Elevated CSF NfL resulted more frequently in ‘Treatment/Escalation’ than normal CSF NfL (P<0.001). Median EDSS change at follow-up was similar between patients receiving ‘No Treatment/No Escalation’ and ‘Treatment/Escalation’ decisions (P=0.81). Conclusions: CSF NfL measurements informed treatment strategies, alongside clinical and MRI measures. CSF NfL levels was the only indicator of disease activity in a subset of patients, which was more pronounced in PMS patients. Elevated CSF NfL was associated with more ‘Treatment/Escalation’ strategies, which had an impact on EDSS outcomes at 1 year.en_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNeurology, Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammationen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titleCSF neurofilament light chain testing as an aid to determine treatment strategies in MSen_US
dc.title.alternativeCSF neurofilament light chain testing as an aid to determine treatment strategies in MSen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.1212/NXI.0000000000000880en_US
pubs.issue6en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume7en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-07-20en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND)