Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating groupen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-18T14:52:58Z
dc.date.available2018-07-30en_US
dc.date.issued2018-09en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/56916
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: , (2018), Association of mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics and anastomotic leak following left sided colorectal resection: an international, multi‐centre, prospective audit. Colorectal Dis, 20: 15-32. doi:10.1111/codi.14362, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14362. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versionsen_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The optimal bowel preparation strategy to minimise the risk of anastomotic leak is yet to be determined. This study aimed to determine whether oral antibiotics combined with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP+Abx) was associated with a reduced risk of anastomotic leak when compared to mechanical bowel preparation alone (MBP) or no bowel preparation (NBP). METHODS: A pre-planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 Left Sided Colorectal Resection audit was performed. Patients undergoing elective left sided colonic or rectal resection with primary anastomosis between 1 January 2017 and 15 March 2017 by any operative approach were included. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak. RESULTS: Of 3676 patients across 343 centres in 47 countries, 618 (16.8%) received MBP+ABx, 1945 MBP (52.9%) and 1099 patients NBP (29.9%). Patients undergoing MBP+ABx had the lowest overall rate of anastomotic leak (6.1%, 9.2%, 8.7% respectively) in unadjusted analysis. After case-mix adjustment using a mixed-effects multivariable regression model, MBP+Abx was associated with a lower risk of anastomotic leak (OR 0.52, 0.30-0.92, P = 0.02) but MBP was not (OR 0.92, 0.63-1.36, P = 0.69) compared to NBP. CONCLUSION: This non-randomised study adds 'real-world', contemporaneous, and prospective evidence of the beneficial effects of combined mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics in the prevention of anastomotic leak following left sided colorectal resection across diverse settings. We have also demonstrated limited uptake of this strategy in current international colorectal practice.en_US
dc.format.extent15 - 32en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofColorectal Disen_US
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.subjectColorectal surgeryen_US
dc.subjectanastomotic leaken_US
dc.subjectbowel preparationen_US
dc.subjectcolonic canceren_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAnastomotic Leaken_US
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agentsen_US
dc.subjectCatharticsen_US
dc.subjectColectomyen_US
dc.subjectDrug Therapy, Combinationen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMedical Auditen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPreoperative Careen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen_US
dc.titleAssociation of mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics and anastomotic leak following left sided colorectal resection: an international, multi-centre, prospective audit.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder2018 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/codi.14362en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255646en_US
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.notesFree Accessen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume20 Suppl 6en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-07-30en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record