Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDubuisson, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarta, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorGnanapavan, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorGiovannoni, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchmierer, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-12T11:36:54Z
dc.date.available2017-08-06en_US
dc.date.issued2017-10en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-11-23T12:37:50.519Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/29763
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis (MS) upper limb neurological impairments, are an important driver of disability and handicap. The gold standard for assessing upper limb function is the 9-hole peg test (9HPT). One disadvantage of the current plastic version is its price, which prevents its widespread use as a self-monitoring tool by the MS community. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an affordable cardboard version of 9HPT for patients to self-monitor upper limb function at home. The aim is not to replace the plastic version, which would stay the gold standard in MS centers. METHODS: We enrolled 177 volunteers, 68 healthy controls and 109 people with MS (pwMS) at varying stages of their disease. Volunteers performed two trials of the 9HPT with their dominant hand and two with their non-dominant hand using both plastic 9HPT and cardboard 9HPT. The primary comparison parameter was the time needed to perform the task. RESULTS: The mean score for the cardboard 9HPT was 24.58 (SEM 1.54s) seconds compared to 26.03 (SEM 1.44s) seconds for the plastic 9HPT (p = 0.007). However, the two versions of the tests correlated very strongly, r = 0.96 (p < 0.001). The coefficient of variation, repeat-repeat testing, showed less variability with the cardboard version than in the plastic one with 10% and 14%, respectively. Two-thirds of pwMS preferred using the cardboard version. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the cardboard version is at least equivalent to the plastic version of the test with arguably better design attributes making it the preferred option for self-monitoring.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBiogen, UK.en_US
dc.format.extent172 - 176en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMult Scler Relat Disorden_US
dc.rights© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject9-hole peg testen_US
dc.subjectCase control studiesen_US
dc.subjectCost effectiveness/economicen_US
dc.subjectMultiple sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectSelf-monitoringen_US
dc.subjectUpper limbs functionen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectConservation of Natural Resourcesen_US
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_US
dc.subjectDisability Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectEquipment Designen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFunctional Lateralityen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectMovement Disordersen_US
dc.subjectMultiple Sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectPaperen_US
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Managementen_US
dc.subjectUpper Extremityen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleValidation of an environmentally-friendly and affordable cardboard 9-hole peg test.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msard.2017.08.002en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29055452en_US
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume17en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-08-06en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record