Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaines, RWen_US
dc.contributor.authorProwle, JRen_US
dc.contributor.authorDay, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorBear, DEen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeyland, DKen_US
dc.contributor.authorPuthucheary, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T10:42:44Z
dc.date.available2024-01-04en_US
dc.date.issued2024-01-16en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/93705
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Delivering higher doses of protein to mechanically ventilated critically ill patients did not improve patient outcomes and may have caused harm. Longitudinal urea measurements could provide additional information about the treatment effect of higher protein doses. We hypothesised that higher urea values over time could explain the potential harmful treatment effects of higher doses of protein. METHODS: We conducted a reanalysis of a randomised controlled trial of higher protein doses in critical illness (EFFORT Protein). We applied Bayesian joint models to estimate the strength of association of urea with 30-day survival and understand the treatment effect of higher protein doses. RESULTS: Of the 1301 patients included in EFFORT Protein, 1277 were included in this analysis. There were 344 deaths at 30 days post-randomisation. By day 6, median urea was 2.1 mmol/L higher in the high protein group (95% CI 1.1-3.2), increasing to 3.0 mmol/L (95% CI 1.3-4.7) by day 12. A twofold rise in urea was associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% credible interval 1.21-1.48), following adjustment of baseline characteristics including age, illness severity, renal replacement therapy, and presence of AKI. This association persisted over the duration of 30-day follow-up and in models adjusting for evolution of organ failure over time. CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of death in patients randomised to a higher protein dose in the EFFORT Protein trial was estimated to be mediated by increased urea cycle activity, of which serum urea is a biological signature. Serum urea should be taken into consideration when initiating and continuing protein delivery in critically ill patients. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03160547 (2017-05-17).en_US
dc.format.extent24 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCrit Careen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectIntensive careen_US
dc.subjectJoint modellingen_US
dc.subjectMulti-organ failureen_US
dc.subjectProteinen_US
dc.subjectUreaen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectCritical Illnessen_US
dc.subjectUreaen_US
dc.subjectBayes Theoremen_US
dc.subjectContinuous Renal Replacement Therapyen_US
dc.subjectRenal Replacement Therapyen_US
dc.titleAssociation between urea trajectory and protein dose in critically ill adults: a secondary exploratory analysis of the effort protein trial (RE-EFFORT).en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2024, The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-024-04799-1en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38229072en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume28en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-04en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record