Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRaichurkar, P
dc.contributor.authorDenehy, L
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, M
dc.contributor.authorKoh, C
dc.contributor.authorPillinger, N
dc.contributor.authorHogan, S
dc.contributor.authorMcBride, K
dc.contributor.authorCarey, S
dc.contributor.authorBartyn, J
dc.contributor.authorHirst, N
dc.contributor.authorSteffens, D
dc.contributor.authorPrehabilitation Expert Collaborative
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T10:49:33Z
dc.date.available2023-08-06
dc.date.available2023-09-13T10:49:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/90682
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Recently, the number of prehabilitation trials has increased significantly. The identification of key research priorities is vital in guiding future research directions. Thus, the aim of this collaborative study was to define key research priorities in prehabilitation for patients undergoing cancer surgery. METHODS: The Delphi methodology was implemented over three rounds of surveys distributed to prehabilitation experts from across multiple specialties, tumour streams and countries via a secure online platform. In the first round, participants were asked to provide baseline demographics and to identify five top prehabilitation research priorities. In successive rounds, participants were asked to rank research priorities on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was considered if > 70% of participants indicated agreement on each research priority. RESULTS: A total of 165 prehabilitation experts participated, including medical doctors, physiotherapists, dieticians, nurses, and academics across four continents. The first round identified 446 research priorities, collated within 75 unique research questions. Over two successive rounds, a list of 10 research priorities reached international consensus of importance. These included the efficacy of prehabilitation on varied postoperative outcomes, benefit to specific patient groups, ideal programme composition, cost efficacy, enhancing compliance and adherence, effect during neoadjuvant therapies, and modes of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This collaborative international study identified the top 10 research priorities in prehabilitation for patients undergoing cancer surgery. The identified priorities inform research strategies, provide future directions for prehabilitation research, support resource allocation and enhance the prehabilitation evidence base in cancer patients undergoing surgery.en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnn Surg Oncol
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectDelphien_US
dc.subjectPerioperative careen_US
dc.subjectPrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectResearch prioritiesen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titleResearch Priorities in Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: An International Delphi Study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-023-14192-x
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37620526en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-08-06


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States