Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOdor, PMen_US
dc.contributor.authorBampoe, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorLucas, DNen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoonesinghe, SRen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorPandit, JJen_US
dc.contributor.authorPan-London Peri-operative Audit and Research Network (PLAN), for the DREAMY Investigators Groupen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T15:55:11Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10en_US
dc.date.issued2021-06en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/78878
dc.description.abstractGeneral anaesthesia for obstetric surgery has distinct characteristics that may contribute towards a higher risk of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, experience and psychological implications of unintended conscious awareness during general anaesthesia in obstetric patients. From May 2017 to August 2018, 3115 consenting patients receiving general anaesthesia for obstetric surgery in 72 hospitals in England were recruited to the study. Patients received three repetitions of standardised questioning over 30 days, with responses indicating memories during general anaesthesia that were verified using interviews and record interrogation. A total of 12 patients had certain/probable or possible awareness, an incidence of 1 in 256 (95%CI 149-500) for all obstetric surgery. The incidence was 1 in 212 (95%CI 122-417) for caesarean section surgery. Distressing experiences were reported by seven (58.3%) patients, paralysis by five (41.7%) and paralysis with pain by two (16.7%). Accidental awareness occurred during induction and emergence in nine (75%) of the patients who reported awareness. Factors associated with accidental awareness during general anaesthesia were: high BMI (25-30 kg.m-2 ); low BMI (<18.5 kg.m-2 ); out-of-hours surgery; and use of ketamine or thiopental for induction. Standardised psychological impact scores at 30 days were significantly higher in awareness patients (median (IQR [range]) 15 (2.7-52.0 [2-56]) than in patients without awareness 3 (1-9 [0-64]), p = 0.010. Four patients had a provisional diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. We conclude that direct postoperative questioning reveals high rates of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia for obstetric surgery, which has implications for anaesthetic practice, consent and follow-up.en_US
dc.format.extent759 - 776en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectaccidental awareness during general anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectanaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectgeneralen_US
dc.subjectobstetricen_US
dc.subjectpost-traumatic stress disorderen_US
dc.subjectrecallen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Generalen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesia, Obstetricalen_US
dc.subjectCesarean Sectionen_US
dc.subjectCohort Studiesen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectIncidenceen_US
dc.subjectIntraoperative Awarenessen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.titleIncidence of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia in obstetrics: a multicentre, prospective cohort study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anae.15385en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33434945en_US
pubs.issue6en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume76en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record