Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition).
View/ Open
Published version
Embargoed until: 5555-01-01
Reason: Version not permitted
Embargoed until: 5555-01-01
Reason: Version not permitted
Pagination
1 - 382
DOI
10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
Journal
Autophagy
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
Authors
Klionsky, DJ; Abdel-Aziz, AK; Abdelfatah, S; Abdellatif, M; Abdoli, A; Abel, S; Abeliovich, H; Abildgaard, MH; Abudu, YP; Acevedo-Arozena, ACollections
Language
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Effect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study
Glasbey, JC; Ademuyiwa, A; Adisa, A; AlAmeer, E; Arnaud, AP; Ayasra, F; Azevedo, J; Minaya Bravo, A; Costas-Chavarri, A; Edwards, J (2021) -
Combination of inclusive top-quark pair production cross-section measurements using ATLAS and CMS data at s = 7 and 8 TeV
Abbott, B; Abbott, DC; Abed Abud, A; Abeling, K; Abhayasinghe, DK; Abidi, SH; Aboulhorma, A; Abramowicz, H; Abreu, H; Abulaiti, Y (Springer Nature, 2023-07-27)A combination of measurements of the inclusive top-quark pair production cross-section performed by ATLAS and CMS in proton–proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV at the LHC is presented. The cross-sections ... -
Combination of Measurements of the Top Quark Mass from Data Collected by the ATLAS and CMS Experiments at s=7 and 8 TeV
Hayrapetyan, A; Tumasyan, A; Adam, W; Andrejkovic, JW; Bergauer, T; Chatterjee, S; Damanakis, K; Dragicevic, M; Hussain, PS; Jeitler, M (27-06-2024)A combination of fifteen top quark mass measurements performed by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at the LHC is presented. The datasets used correspond to an integrated luminosity of up to 5 and 20 fb^{-1} of proton-proton ...