Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerney, S
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, RO
dc.contributor.authorRose, JW
dc.contributor.authorKoopman, R
dc.contributor.authorPuthucheary, Z
dc.contributor.authorPastva, A
dc.contributor.authorGordon, I
dc.contributor.authorColantuoni, E
dc.contributor.authorParry, SM
dc.contributor.authorNeedham, DM
dc.contributor.authorDenehy, L
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-12T14:30:08Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04
dc.date.available2021-01-12T14:30:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-15
dc.identifier.citationBerney S, Hopkins RO, Rose JW, et al. Functional electrical stimulation in-bed cycle ergometry in mechanically ventilated patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Thorax. ublished Online First: 15 December 2020. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215093en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/69629
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To investigate the effect of functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycle ergometry (FES-cycling) on muscle strength, cognitive impairment and related outcomes. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients aged ≥18 years with sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome were randomised to either 60 min of FES-cycling >5 days/week while in the intensive care unit (ICU) plus usual care rehabilitation versus usual care rehabilitation alone, with evaluation of two primary outcomes: (1) muscle strength at hospital discharge and (2) cognitive impairment at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: We enrolled 162 participants, across four study sites experienced in ICU rehabilitation in Australia and the USA, to FES-cycling (n=80; mean age±SD 59±15) versus control (n=82; 56±14). Intervention participants received a median (IQR) of 5 (3-9) FES-cycling sessions with duration of 56 (34-63) min/day plus 15 (10-23) min/day of usual care rehabilitation. The control group received 15 (8-15) min/day of usual care rehabilitation. In the intervention versus control group, there was no significant differences for muscle strength at hospital discharge (mean difference (95% CI) 3.3 (-5.0 to 12.1) Nm), prevalence of cognitive impairment at 6 months (OR 1.1 (95% CI 0.30 to 3.8)) or secondary outcomes measured in-hospital and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this randomised controlled trial, undertaken at four centres with established rehabilitation programmes, the addition of FES-cycling to usual care rehabilitation did not substantially increase muscle strength at hospital discharge. At 6 months, the incidence of cognitive impairment was almost identical between groups, but potential benefit or harm of the intervention on cognition cannot be excluded due to imprecision of the estimated effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12612000528853, NCT02214823.en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThorax
dc.subjectcritical careen_US
dc.subjectexerciseen_US
dc.titleFunctional electrical stimulation in-bed cycle ergometry in mechanically ventilated patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215093
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33323480en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2020/12/15/thoraxjnl-2020-215093
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-04
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record