• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine. 
    •   QMRO Home
    • Institute of Health Sciences Education
    • Centre for Medical Education
    • Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine.
    •   QMRO Home
    • Institute of Health Sciences Education
    • Centre for Medical Education
    • Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine.
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine.

    Volume
    199
    Pagination
    179 - 187
    DOI
    10.1016/j.jspi.2018.06.004
    Journal
    J Stat Plan Inference
    ISSN
    0378-3758
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Precision medicine, aka stratified/personalized medicine, is becoming more pronounced in the medical field due to advancement in computational ability to learn about patient genomic backgrounds. A biomaker, i.e. a type of biological process indicator, is often used in precision medicine to classify patient population into several subgroups. The aim of precision medicine is to tailor treatment regimes for different patient subgroups who suffer from the same disease. A multi-arm design could be conducted to explore the effect of treatment regimes on different biomarker subgroups. However, if treatments work only on certain subgroups, which is often the case, enrolling all patient subgroups in a confirmatory trial would increase the burden of a study. Having observed a phase II trial, we propose a design framework for finding an optimal design that could be implemented in a phase III study or a confirmatory trial. We consider two elements in our approach: Bayesian data analysis of observed data, and design of experiments. The first tool selects subgroups and treatments to be enrolled in the future trial whereas the second tool provides an optimal treatment randomization scheme for each selected/enrolled subgroups. Considering two independent treatments and two independent biomarkers, we illustrate our approach using simulation studies. We demonstrate efficiency gain, i.e. high probability of recommending truly effective treatments in the right subgroup, of the optimal design found by our framework over a randomized controlled trial and a biomarker-treatment linked trial.
    Authors
    Lee, KM; Wason, J
    URI
    https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/63009
    Collections
    • Centre for Medical Education [74]
    Language
    eng
    Licence information
    This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    Copyright statements
    © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.