Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHewitt-Smith, A
dc.contributor.authorBulamba, F
dc.contributor.authorTtendo, S
dc.contributor.authorPappenheim, K
dc.contributor.authorWalker, IA
dc.contributor.authorSmith, AF
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T13:32:22Z
dc.date.available2017-10-01
dc.date.available2019-08-12T13:32:22Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-07
dc.identifier.issn0003-2409
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/59003
dc.description.abstractThe Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland and the then Uganda Society of Anaesthesia established the Uganda Fellowship Scheme in 2006, to provide scholarships to encourage doctors to train in anaesthesia in Uganda. We conducted an evaluation of this programme using online questionnaires and face‐to‐face semi‐structured interviews with trainees who received scholarships, as well as with senior surgeons and anaesthetists. Focus group discussions were held to assess changes in attitudes towards anaesthesia over the last 10 years. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the constant comparative method. A total of 54 Ugandan doctors have received anaesthesia scholarships since 2006 (median funding per trainee (IQR [range]) £5520 (£5520–£6750 [£765–£9000]). There has been a four‐fold increase in the number of physician anaesthetists in Uganda during this time. All those who received funding remain in the region. The speciality of anaesthesia is undergoing a dramatic transformation led by this group of motivated young anaesthetists. There is increased access to intensive care, and this has allowed surgical specialities to develop. There is greater understanding and visibility of anaesthesia, and the quality of education in anaesthesia throughout the country has improved. The Uganda Fellowship Scheme provided a relatively small financial incentive to encourage doctors to train as anaesthetists. Evaluation of the project shows a wide‐ranging impact that extends beyond the initial goal of simply improving human resource capacity. Financial incentives combined with strong ‘north‐south’ links between professional organisations can play an important role in tackling the shortage of anaesthesia providers in a low‐income country and in improving access to safe surgery and anaesthesia.en_US
dc.format.extent284 - 294
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofANAESTHESIA
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Hewitt‐Smith, A., Bulamba, F., Ttendo, S., Pappenheim, K., Walker, I. A., & Smith, A. F. (2018). A mixed‐methods evaluation of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Uganda Fellowship Scheme. Anaesthesia, 73(3), 284-294., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14116. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
dc.subjectlow-income countryen_US
dc.subjectquality improvementen_US
dc.subjecttrainingen_US
dc.subjectworkforceen_US
dc.titleA mixed-methods evaluation of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland Uganda Fellowship Schemeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2018 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anae.14116
pubs.author-urlhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000429176400004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=612ae0d773dcbdba3046f6df545e9f6aen_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14116
pubs.volume73en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record