Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorACKLAND, GL
dc.contributor.authorBrudney, C
dc.contributor.authorCecconi, M
dc.contributor.authorInce, C
dc.contributor.authorIrwin, M
dc.contributor.authorLacey, J
dc.contributor.authorPinsky, M
dc.contributor.authorGrocott, M
dc.contributor.authorMythen, M
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, M
dc.contributor.authorMiller, T
dc.contributor.editorHemmings, H
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-07T07:48:38Z
dc.date.available2019-01-02
dc.date.available2019-08-07T07:48:38Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-13
dc.identifier.issn1471-6771
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/58876
dc.description.abstractBackground: A multi-disciplinary, international working subgroup of the Third Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus meeting reviewed the (patho)physiology and measurement of arterial blood pressure (ABP), as applied to perioperative medicine. Methods: We addressed predefined questions by undertaking a modified Delphi analysis, in which primary clinical research and review articles were identified using MEDLINE. Strength of recommendations, where applicable, were graded by NICE guidelines. Results: Perioperative ABP management is a physiologically-complex challenge influenced by multiple factors: (i) ABP is the input pressure to organ blood flow, but is not the sole determinant of perfusion pressure; (ii) blood flow is often independent of changes in perfusion pressure, due to autoregulatory changes in vascular resistance; (iii) microvascular dysfunction uncouples microvascular blood flow from ABP (haemodynamic incoherence) From a practical clinical perspective, we identified that: (i) ambulatory measurement is the optimal method to establish baseline ABP; (ii) automated and invasive ABP measurements have inherent physiological and technical limitations; (iii) individualised ABP targets may change over time, especially during the perioperative period. There remains a need for research in non-invasive, continuous arterial pressure measurements, macro- and microcirculatory control, regional perfusion pressure measurement and the development of sensitive, specific and continuous measures of cellular function to evaluate blood pressure management in a physiologically coherent manner. Conclusion: The multivariable, complex physiology contributing to dynamic changes in perioperative ABP may be underappreciated clinically. The frequently unrecognised dissociation between ABP, organ blood flow, microvascular and cellular function requires further research that develops a more refined, contextualized clinical approach to this routine measurement.en_US
dc.format.extent542–551
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.titlePerioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus statement on the physiology of blood pressure control as applied to perioperative medicine.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.011
pubs.issue5
pubs.notes12 monthsen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.011
pubs.volume122
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-01-02
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
qmul.funderParasympathetic modulation of perioperative myocardial injury.::Royal College Of Anaesthetists/ British Journal of Anaesthesiaen_US
qmul.funderParasympathetic modulation of perioperative myocardial injury.::Royal College Of Anaesthetists/ British Journal of Anaesthesiaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record