Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor2017. The authors
dc.contributor.authorKon, SSCen_US
dc.contributor.authorJolley, CJen_US
dc.contributor.authorShrikrishna, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, HEen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkipworth, JRAen_US
dc.contributor.authorPuthucheary, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoxham, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorPolkey, MIen_US
dc.contributor.authorMan, WD-Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHopkinson, NSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-24T11:27:07Z
dc.date.available2017-01-13en_US
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.issn2052-4439en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/57002
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Skeletal muscle impairment is an important feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Renin-angiotensin system activity influences muscle phenotype, so we wished to investigate whether it affects the response to pulmonary rehabilitation. METHODS: Two studies are described; in the first, the response of 168 COPD patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second 51.9% predicted) to pulmonary rehabilitation was compared between different ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism genotypes. In a second, independent COPD cohort (n=373), baseline characteristics and response to pulmonary rehabilitation were compared between COPD patients who were or were not taking ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARB). RESULTS: In study 1, the incremental shuttle walk distance improved to a similar extent in all three genotypes; DD/ID/II (n=48/91/29) 69(67)m, 61 (76)m and 78 (78)m, respectively, (p>0.05). In study 2, fat free mass index was higher in those on ACE-I/ARB (n=130) than those who were not (n=243), 17.8 (16.0, 19.8) kg m-2 vs 16.5 (14.9, 18.4) kg/m2 (p<0.001). However change in fat free mass, walking distance or quality of life in response to pulmonary rehabilitation did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While these data support a positive association of ACE-I/ARB treatment and body composition in COPD, neither treatment to reduce ACE activity nor ACE (I/D) genotype influence response to pulmonary rehabilitation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was funded by a Trevor Clay grant from The British Lung Foundation (TC 04/4) and supported by the NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital and Imperial College who part fund MIP’s salary. WD-CM is an NIHR Clinician Scientist and supported by a MRC New Investigator Research Grant. DS was funded by the MRC G0701628. ZP is a NIHR Doctorate Research Fellow. SSCK and CJJ were funded by the MRCen_US
dc.format.extente000165 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open Respir Resen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCOPD Pathologyen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary Rehabilitationen_US
dc.titleACE and response to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: two observational studies.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000165en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321311en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume4en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-01-13en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution License