Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer
Pagination
48 - 56
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.022
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN
0959-8049
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background
Mammographic density has been shown to be a strong independent predictor of breast cancer and a causative factor in reducing the sensitivity of mammography. There remain questions as to the use of mammographic density information in the context of screening and risk management, and of the association with cancer in populations known to be at increased risk of breast cancer.
Aim
To assess the association of breast density with presence of cancer by measuring mammographic density visually as a percentage, and with two automated volumetric methods, Quantra™ and VolparaDensity™.
Methods
The TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY (TOMMY) study of digital breast tomosynthesis in the Breast Screening Programme of the National Health Service (NHS) of the United Kingdom (UK) included 6020 breast screening assessment cases (of whom 1158 had breast cancer) and 1040 screened women with a family history of breast cancer (of whom two had breast cancer). We assessed the association of each measure with breast cancer risk in these populations at enhanced risk, using logistic regression adjusted for age and total breast volume as a surrogate for body mass index (BMI).
Results
All density measures showed a positive association with presence of cancer and all declined with age. The strongest effect was seen with Volpara absolute density, with a significant 3% (95% CI 1–5%) increase in risk per 10 cm3 of dense tissue. The effect of Volpara volumetric density on risk was stronger for large and grade 3 tumours.
Conclusions
Automated absolute breast density is a predictor of breast cancer risk in populations at enhanced risk due to either positive mammographic findings or family history. In the screening context, density could be a trigger for more intensive imaging.
Authors
Duffy, SW; Morrish, OWE; Allgood, PC; Black, R; Gillan, MGC; Willsher, P; Cooke, J; Duncan, KA; Michell, MJ; Dobson, HMCollections
- Centre for Cancer Prevention [1199]
Licence information
Copyright statements
The following license files are associated with this item:
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution License
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I
Warwick, J; Birke, H; Stone, J; Warren, RML; Pinney, E; Brentnall, AR; Duffy, SW; Howell, A; Cuzick, J (2014) -
Benefits and harms of breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: A systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer.
Canelo-Aybar, C; Ferreira, DS; Ballesteros, M; Posso, M; Montero, N; Solà, I; Saz-Parkinson, Z; Lerda, D; Rossi, PG; Duffy, SW (Sage, 2021-02-25)OBJECTIVES: Mammography screening is generally accepted in women aged 50-69, but the balance between benefits and harms remains controversial in other age groups. This study systematically reviews these effects to inform ... -
Impact of preventive therapy on the risk of breast cancer among women with benign breast disease.
Cuzick, J; Sestak, I; Thorat, MA (2015-08-06)There are three main ways in which women can be identified as being at high risk of breast cancer i) family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, which includes genetic factors ii) mammographically identified high breast ...