Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrebely, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorFeld, JJen_US
dc.contributor.authorWyles, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorSulkowski, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorNi, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorLlewellyn, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorMir, HMen_US
dc.contributor.authorSajed, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorStamm, LMen_US
dc.contributor.authorHyland, RHen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcNally, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrainard, DMen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobson, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorZeuzem, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBourlière, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorAfdhal, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorDore, GJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-05T08:06:51Z
dc.date.available2018-01-17en_US
dc.date.issued2018-02en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-03-29T14:35:01.359Z
dc.identifier.issn2328-8957en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/36234
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antiviral therapy is effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but studies are limited by small numbers of nongenotype 1 (GT1) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in HCV patients receiving and not receiving OST. Methods: Ten phase 3 studies of sofosbuvir-based regimens included ION (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in GT1), ASTRAL (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks in GT1-6), and POLARIS (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in GT1-6). Patients with clinically significant drug use (last 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening were ineligible. Results: Among 4743 patients, 4% (n = 194) were receiving OST (methadone; n = 113; buprenorphine, n = 75; other, n = 6). Compared with those not receiving OST (n = 4549), those receiving OST (n = 194) were younger (mean age, 48 vs 54), more often male (73% vs 61%), GT3 (38% vs 17%), treatment-naïve (78% vs 65%), and cirrhotic (36% vs 23%). Among those receiving and not receiving OST, there was no significant difference in treatment completion (97% vs 99%, P = .06), SVR12 (94% vs 97%, P = .06), relapse (0.5% vs 2.1%, P = .19), adverse events (78% vs 77%, P = .79), or serious adverse events (3.6% vs 2.4%, P = .24). There was no difference in SVR12 in patients with cirrhosis (99% vs 95%, P = .25) or those with G3 (95% vs 95%, P = .77) in those receiving OST. Among patients receiving OST, SVR12 was high among those receiving methadone (95%) and buprenorphine (96%). Conclusion: Sofosbuvir-based therapies are effective and safe in patients receiving OST.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Gilead Sciences.en_US
dc.format.extentofy001 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Forum Infect Disen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectDAAen_US
dc.subjectPWIDen_US
dc.subjectdrug useen_US
dc.subjecthepatitis C virusen_US
dc.subjectinterferon-freeen_US
dc.subjectledipasviren_US
dc.subjectsofosbuviren_US
dc.subjectvelpatasviren_US
dc.subjectvoxilapreviren_US
dc.titleSofosbuvir-Based Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapies for HCV in People Receiving Opioid Substitution Therapy: An Analysis of Phase 3 Studies.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderCopyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ofid/ofy001en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450210en_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume5en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-17en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record