Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, BAen_US
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarthikesalingam, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoloniecki, JDen_US
dc.contributor.authorPearse, RMen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrocott, MPWen_US
dc.contributor.authorThompson, MMen_US
dc.contributor.authorHolt, PJEen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-15T15:47:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-01en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-02-02T19:02:22.970Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/11488
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Variations in patient outcomes between providers have been described for emergency admissions, including general surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differences in modifiable hospital structures and processes were associated with variance in mortality, amongst patients admitted for emergency colorectal laparotomy, peptic ulcer surgery, appendicectomy, hernia repair and pancreatitis. METHODS: Adult emergency admissions in the English NHS were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics between April 2005 and March 2010. The association between mortality and structure and process measures including medical and nursing staffing levels, critical care and operating theatre availability, radiology utilization, teaching hospital status and weekend admissions were investigated. RESULTS: There were 294 602 emergency admissions to 156 NHS Trusts (hospital systems) with a 30-day mortality of 4.2%. Trust-level mortality rates for this cohort ranged from 1.6 to 8.0%. The lowest mortality rates were observed in Trusts with higher levels of medical and nursing staffing, and a greater number of operating theatres and critical care beds relative to provider size. Higher mortality rates were seen in patients admitted to hospital at weekends [OR 1.11 (95% CI 1.06-1.17) P<0.0001], in Trusts with fewer general surgical doctors [1.07 (1.01-1.13) P=0.019] and with lower nursing staff ratios [1.07 (1.01-1.13) P=0.024]. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences between Trusts were identified in staffing and other infrastructure resources for patients admitted with an emergency general surgical diagnosis. Associations between these factors and mortality rates suggest that potentially modifiable factors exist that relate to patient outcomes, and warrant further investigation.en_US
dc.format.extent54 - 62en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBr J Anaesthen_US
dc.rights• “The final publication is available at http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/116/1/54.long”
dc.subjecthealth resourcesen_US
dc.subjecthealth services researchen_US
dc.subjecthealthcare deliveryen_US
dc.subjectoutcomeen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAfter-Hours Careen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectAppendectomyen_US
dc.subjectColorectal Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectCritical Careen_US
dc.subjectEmergenciesen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHerniorrhaphyen_US
dc.subjectHospital Mortalityen_US
dc.subjectHospitalsen_US
dc.subjectHospitals, Teachingen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPancreatitisen_US
dc.subjectPeptic Ulceren_US
dc.subjectPersonnel Staffing and Schedulingen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operativeen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleMortality of emergency general surgical patients and associations with hospital structures and processes.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aev372en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675949en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume116en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record