Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Souza, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorRait, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeehan, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorSampson, ELen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T11:40:43Z
dc.date.available2021-05-16en_US
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/98774
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Many people with dementia reach the end-of-life without an advance care plan. Many are not ready to have conversations about end-of-life, and decision-making is left to their families and professionals when they no longer have capacity. Carers may benefit from further support with decision-making. To develop this support, it is important to understand the decision-making process. AIM: Explore with family carers and people living with dementia the decision-making process and factors that influence decision-making in dementia end of life care, to produce a model of decision-making in the context of dementia end-of-life care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 21 family carers and 11 people with dementia in England (2018-2019) from memory clinics, general practice and carer organisations. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis and findings were mapped onto the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making model, refined to produce a modified model of decision-making in dementia. RESULTS: Participants described five key decisions towards the end-of-life as examples of decision making. We used these experiences to produce a modified model of decision-making in dementia end-of-life-care. The model considers the contextual factors that influence the decision-making process, including: personal preferences; advance care planning and Lasting Power of Attorney; capacity and health and wellbeing of the person with dementia; support from others and clarity of roles. The decision-making process consists of seven inter-linked stages: 1) identifying the decision maker or team; 2) sharing and exchanging information; 3) clarifying values and preferences; 4) managing and considering emotions; 5) considering the feasibility of options; 6) balancing preferred choice and the actual choice; and 7) implementation and reflecting on outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The modified model breaks down the decision-making process and attempts to simplify the process while capturing the subtle nuances of decision making. It provides a framework for conversations and supporting decisions by carers.en_US
dc.format.extente0252464 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectCaregiversen_US
dc.subjectDecision Makingen_US
dc.subjectDementiaen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectInterviews as Topicen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectModels, Theoreticalen_US
dc.subjectTerminal Careen_US
dc.titleDeveloping an applied model for making decisions towards the end of life about care for someone with dementia.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Davies et al.
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0252464en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043728en_US
pubs.issue5en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume16en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-05-16en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record