Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, N
dc.contributor.authorAker, N
dc.contributor.authorWest, E
dc.contributor.authorRait, G
dc.contributor.authorSampson, EL
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T07:24:38Z
dc.date.available2024-06-07
dc.date.available2024-08-12T07:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-19
dc.identifier.citationDavies, N., Aker, N., West, E., Rait, G. and Sampson, E.L. (2024), Acceptability of Using a Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People With Dementia Towards the End of Life: A Qualitative Study. Health Expectations, 27: e14123. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.14123en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/98724
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences, acceptability and utility of a decision aid for family carers of people with dementia towards the end of life. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of family carers enroled into a 6-month feasibility study in England, sampling to gain a range of experiences and views, based on relationship to person they cared for (e.g., spouse, adult child), age, gender, and self-reported use of the decision aid during the feasibility study. Interviews were conducted in March 2021-July 2021 and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. We used COREQ checklist to report our methods and results. RESULTS: Family carers found the decision aid acceptable, describing it as comprehensive, accessible with relevant information and its presentation enabled good engagement. Experiences of the decision aid covered four main themes which demonstrated the perceived acceptability and utility: 1. A source of support and reassurance; 2. Empowering conversations and confidence; 3. Including the person living with dementia; and 4. Breaking down complexity. CONCLUSIONS: An aid focussing on decisions about dementia end of life care supported family carers break down complex and emotive decisions, not only with making decisions in the moment but also in future planning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Our three Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) members (all former family carers) were crucial throughout the wider study. PPI supported development of the topic guides, supported trialling the topic guide and interview procedures and finally supported the development of themes as part of the analysis.en_US
dc.format.extente14123 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealth Expect
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectdecision makingen_US
dc.subjectdecision‐aiden_US
dc.subjectdementiaen_US
dc.subjectpalliative careen_US
dc.subjectqualitativeen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectDementiaen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectCaregiversen_US
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_US
dc.subjectTerminal Careen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectDecision Support Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectInterviews as Topicen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectDecision Makingen_US
dc.subjectFeasibility Studiesen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.titleAcceptability of Using a Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People With Dementia Towards the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/hex.14123
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38896012en_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume27en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-06-07
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record