Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMerriel, SWDen_US
dc.contributor.authorButtle, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrice, SJen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurns-Cox, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalter, FMen_US
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, AEen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-01T10:20:27Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/98547
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To explore the potential impacts of incorporating prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging into primary care as a triage test within the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Subjects and methods: Decision analytic modelling with decision trees was utilised for this early economic evaluation. A conceptual model was developed reflecting the common primary care routes to diagnosis for prostate cancer: opportunistic, asymptomatic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening or symptomatic presentation. The use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) or biparametric MRI (bpMRI) as a primary care triage test following an elevated PSA result was evaluated. A health system perspective was adopted with a time horizon of 12 months. Health effects were expressed in terms of utilities drawn from the literature. The primary outcome was prostate cancer diagnosis. Evidence used to inform the model was drawn from published primary studies, systematic reviews, and secondary analyses of primary and secondary care datasets. Results: Base case analysis showed that the PSA pathway was dominated by both mpMRI- and bpMRI-based pathways for patients undergoing opportunistic screening and symptomatic assessment. bpMRI pathways had greater improvement in cost and utility than mpMRI pathways in both clinical scenarios. Significantly more MRI scans would be performed using the modelled approach (66 626 scans vs. 37 456 scans per 100 000 patients per annum), with fewer subsequent urgent suspected cancer referrals for both mpMRI (38% reduction for screening and symptomatic patients) and bpMRI (72% reduction for screening; 71% for symptomatic) pathways, and a small increase in number of missed cancer diagnoses. Deterministic sensitivity analyses, varying each parameter to its upper and lower 95% confidence intervals, showed no significant change in the dominance of the MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathways. Conclusion: Using prostate MRI as a second-level triage test for suspected prostate cancer in primary care could reduce health service costs without a detrimental effect on patient utility.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofBJUI Compassen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.titleEarly economic evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection in primary careen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Author(s). BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bco2.409en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
qmul.funderCanTest- Cancer diagnostic testing in primary care.::Cancer Research UKen_US
rioxxterms.funder.projectb215eee3-195d-4c4f-a85d-169a4331c138en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record