Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMesnage, R
dc.contributor.authorPanzacchi, S
dc.contributor.authorBourne, E
dc.contributor.authorMein, CA
dc.contributor.authorPerry, MJ
dc.contributor.authorHu, J
dc.contributor.authorChen, J
dc.contributor.authorMandrioli, D
dc.contributor.authorBelpoggi, F
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, MN
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-23T13:17:50Z
dc.date.available2022-08-11
dc.date.available2024-07-23T13:17:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-05
dc.identifier.citationMesnage R, Panzacchi S, Bourne E, Mein CA, Perry MJ, Hu J, Chen J, Mandrioli D, Belpoggi F and Antoniou MN (2022) Glyphosate and its formulations Roundup Bioflow and RangerPro alter bacterial and fungal community composition in the rat caecum microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 13:888853. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.888853en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-302X
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/98360
dc.description.abstractThe potential health consequences of glyphosate-induced gut microbiome alterations have become a matter of intense debate. As part of a multifaceted study investigating toxicity, carcinogenicity and multigenerational effects of glyphosate and its commercial herbicide formulations, we assessed changes in bacterial and fungal populations in the caecum microbiota of rats exposed prenatally until adulthood (13 weeks after weaning) to three doses of glyphosate (0.5, 5, 50 mg/kg body weight/day), or to the formulated herbicide products Roundup Bioflow and RangerPro at the same glyphosate-equivalent doses. Caecum bacterial microbiota were evaluated by 16S rRNA sequencing whilst the fungal population was determined by ITS2 amplicon sequencing. Results showed that both fungal and bacterial diversity were affected by the Roundup formulations in a dose-dependent manner, whilst glyphosate alone significantly altered only bacterial diversity. At taxa level, a reduction in Bacteroidota abundance, marked by alterations in the levels of Alloprevotella, Prevotella and Prevotellaceae UCG-003, was concomitant to increased levels of Firmicutes (e.g., Romboutsia, Dubosiella, Eubacterium brachy group or Christensenellaceae) and Actinobacteria (e.g., Enterorhabdus, Adlercreutzia, or Asaccharobacter). Treponema and Mycoplasma also had their levels reduced by the pesticide treatments. Analysis of fungal composition indicated that the abundance of the rat gut commensal Ascomycota Kazachstania was reduced while the abundance of Gibberella, Penicillium, Claviceps, Cornuvesica, Candida, Trichoderma and Sarocladium were increased by exposure to the Roundup formulations, but not to glyphosate. Altogether, our data suggest that glyphosate and its Roundup RangerPro and Bioflow caused profound changes in caecum microbiome composition by affecting the fitness of major commensals, which in turn reduced competition and allowed opportunistic fungi to grow in the gut, in particular in animals exposed to the herbicide formulations. This further indicates that changes in gut microbiome composition might influence the long-term toxicity, carcinogenicity and multigenerational effects of glyphosate-based herbicides.en_US
dc.format.extent888853 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFront Microbiol
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms
dc.subjectglyphosateen_US
dc.subjectmicrobiota (16S)en_US
dc.subjectmycobiomeen_US
dc.subjectpesticidesen_US
dc.subjecttoxicityen_US
dc.titleGlyphosate and its formulations Roundup Bioflow and RangerPro alter bacterial and fungal community composition in the rat caecum microbiome.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Mesnage, Panzacchi, Bourne, Mein, Perry, Hu, Chen, Mandrioli, Belpoggi and Antoniou
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmicb.2022.888853
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274693en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume13en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-08-11
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.funder.projectb215eee3-195d-4c4f-a85d-169a4331c138en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record