Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmittenaar, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorQuaife, SLen_US
dc.contributor.authorvon Wagner, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorHubbell, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-24T09:27:16Z
dc.date.available2024-02-10en_US
dc.date.issued2024-05-09en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/97625
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Cancer burden is higher and cancer screening participation is lower among individuals living in more socioeconomically deprived areas of England, contributing to worse health outcomes and shorter life expectancy. Owing to higher multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test sensitivity for poor-prognosis cancers and greater cancer burden in groups experiencing greater deprivation, MCED screening programmes may have greater relative benefits in these groups. We modelled potential differential benefits of MCED screening between deprivation groups in England at different levels of screening participation. METHODS: We applied the interception multi-cancer screening model to cancer incidence and survival data made available by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service in England to estimate reductions in late-stage diagnoses and cancer mortality from an MCED screening programme by deprivation group across 24 cancer types. We assessed the impact of varying the proportion of people who participated in annual screening in each deprivation group on these estimates. RESULTS: The modelled benefits of an MCED screening programme were substantial: reductions in late-stage diagnoses were 160 and 274 per 100 000 persons in the least and most deprived groups, respectively. Reductions in cancer mortality were 60 and 99 per 100 000 persons in the least and most deprived groups, respectively. Benefits were greatest in the most deprived group at every participation level and were attenuated with lower screening participation. CONCLUSIONS: For the greatest possible population benefit and to decrease health inequalities, an MCED implementation strategy should focus on enhancing equitable, informed participation, enabling equal participation across all socioeconomic deprivation groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05611632.en_US
dc.format.extent345 - 353en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJ Epidemiol Community Healthen_US
dc.rightsRe-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
dc.subjectEPIDEMIOLOGYen_US
dc.subjectHEALTHCARE DISPARITIESen_US
dc.subjectNEOPLASMSen_US
dc.subjectPUBLIC HEALTHen_US
dc.subjectSCREENINGen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Canceren_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectIncidenceen_US
dc.subjectMass Screeningen_US
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectSocial Classen_US
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Factorsen_US
dc.titleImpact of screening participation on modelled mortality benefits of a multi-cancer early detection test by socioeconomic group in England.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jech-2023-220834en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38429085en_US
pubs.issue6en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume78en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-02-10en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record