Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCooper, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorZabihi, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkhtar, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorIsaaq, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorLe Novere, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBarber, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorLord, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorRapaport, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuggan, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorOgden, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorWalters, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorOrgeta, Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorRockwood, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorButler, LTen_US
dc.contributor.authorManthorpe, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorDow, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorHoe, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBudgett, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-21T08:12:53Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/97577
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: In the first randomised controlled trial of a dementia training and support intervention in UK homecare agencies, we aimed to assess: acceptability of our co-designed, manualised training, delivered by non-clinical facilitators; outcome completion feasibility; and costs for a future trial. METHODS: This cluster-randomised (2:1) single-blind, feasibility trial involved English homecare agencies. Intervention arm agency staff were offered group videocall sessions: 6 over 3 months, then monthly for 3 months (NIDUS-professional). Family carers (henceforth carers) and clients with dementia (dyads) were offered six to eight complementary, individual intervention sessions (NIDUS-Family). We collected potential trial measures as secondary outcomes remotely at baseline and 6 months: HCW (homecare worker) Work-related Strain Inventory (WRSI), Sense of Competence (SoC); proxy-rated Quality of Life (QOL), Disability Assessment for Dementia scale (DAD), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Homecare Satisfaction (HCS). RESULTS: From December 2021 to September 2022, we met agency (4 intervention, 2 control) and HCWs (n = 62) recruitment targets and recruited 16 carers and 16/60 planned clients. We met a priori progression criteria for adherence (≥4/6 sessions: 29/44 [65.9%,95% confidence interval (CI): 50.1,79.5]), HCW or carer proxy-outcome completion (15/16 (93.8% [69.8,99.8]) and proceeding with adaptation for HCWs outcome completion (46/63 (73.0% [CI: 60.3,83.4]). Delivery of NIDUS-Professional costs was £6,423 (£137 per eligible client). WRSI scores decreased and SoC increased at follow-up, with no significant between-group differences. For intervention arm proxy-rated outcomes, carer-rated QOL increased, HCW-rated was unchanged; carer and HCW-rated NPI decreased; DAD decreased (greater disability) and HCS was unchanged. CONCLUSION: A pragmatic trial is warranted; we will consider using aggregated, agency-level client outcomes, including neuropsychiatric symptoms.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAge Ageingen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
dc.subjectcarersen_US
dc.subjectdementiaen_US
dc.subjectfeasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT)en_US
dc.subjecthomecareen_US
dc.subjectolder peopleen_US
dc.subjecttrainingen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectDementiaen_US
dc.subjectFeasibility Studiesen_US
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Methoden_US
dc.subjectCaregiversen_US
dc.titleFeasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-professional, a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia: a cluster-randomised feasibility trial.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/afae074en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38643354en_US
pubs.issue4en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume53en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record