Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelleher, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorWindle, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorRandell, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorLord, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorAkhtar, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorBudgett, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorZabihi, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorRapaport, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorBarber, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrgeta, Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorManthorpe, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalters, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorRockwood, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorDow, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorHoe, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-20T13:19:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/97558
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: This process evaluation was conducted in parallel to the randomised controlled feasibility trial of NIDUS-Professional, a manualised remote dementia training intervention for homecare workers (HCWs), delivered alongside an individualised intervention for clients living with dementia and their family carers (NIDUS-Family). The process evaluation reports on: (i) intervention reach, dose and fidelity; (ii) contexts influencing agency engagement and (iii) alignment of findings with theoretical assumptions about how the intervention might produce change. METHODS: We report proportions of eligible HCWs receiving any intervention (reach), number of sessions attended (dose; attending ≥4/6 main sessions was predefined as adhering), intervention fidelity and adherence of clients and carers to NIDUS-Family (attending all 6-8 planned sessions). We interviewed HCWs, managers, family carers and facilitators. We integrated and thematically analysed, at the homecare agency level, qualitative interview and intervention recording data. RESULTS: 32/141 (23%) of eligible HCWs and 7/42 (17%) of family carers received any intervention; most who did adhered to the intervention (89% and 71%). Intervention fidelity was high. We analysed interviews with 20/44 HCWs, 3/4 managers and 3/7 family carers, as well as intervention recordings involving 32/44 HCWs. All agencies reported structural challenges in supporting intervention delivery. Agencies with greater management buy-in had higher dose and reach. HCWs valued NIDUS-Professional for enabling group reflection and peer support, providing practical, actionable care strategies and increasing their confidence as practitioners. CONCLUSION: NIDUS-Professional was valued by HCWs. Agency management, culture and priorities were key barriers to implementation; we discuss how to address these in a future trial.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAge Ageingen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectcarersen_US
dc.subjectdementiaen_US
dc.subjecthomecareen_US
dc.subjectimplementationen_US
dc.subjectolder peopleen_US
dc.subjectprocess evaluationen_US
dc.subjecttrainingen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectDementiaen_US
dc.subjectCaregiversen_US
dc.subjectHome Health Aidesen_US
dc.subjectHome Care Servicesen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practiceen_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subjectProcess Assessment, Health Careen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_US
dc.subjectInterviews as Topicen_US
dc.titleA process evaluation of the NIDUS-Professional dementia training intervention for UK homecare workers.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/afae109en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38796316en_US
pubs.issue5en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume53en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record