Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOnwuka, SRen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorWijesuriya, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorBroun, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorMarker, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorShub, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, JGen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacrae, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorChondros, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaya, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorNovy, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, MAen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalter, FMen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrevena, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Gutierrez, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorFishman, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmery, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-27T09:09:57Z
dc.date.available2024-03-14en_US
dc.date.issued2024-03-25en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/95782
dc.description.abstractBackground Australian guidelines recommend that all people aged 50-70 years old consider taking low-dose aspirin to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Aim To determine the effect of a consultation with a researcher in general practice using a decision aid about taking low-dose aspirin to prevent CRC on informed decision-making and low-dose aspirin uptake compared to a general CRC prevention brochure. Design and Setting Individually randomised controlled trial in six general practices in Victoria, Australia, from October 2020 to March 2021. Method Patients aged 50-70 years attending a general practitioner (GP) were recruited consecutively. The intervention was a consultation using a decision aid to discuss taking aspirin to reduce CRC risk; control consultations discussed reducing CRC risk generally. The self-reported co-primary outcomes were informed choices about taking aspirin at one month and low-dose aspirin uptake at six months. Results 261 participants (86% of eligible patients) were randomised into trial arms (129 intervention, 132 control). 17.7% (20/113) of intervention and 7.6% (9/118) control participants reported making an informed choice at one month, an estimated 9.1% (95% CI 0.29% to 18.5) between-arm difference in proportions [odds ratio (OR) 2.47 (97.5% CI:0.94 to 6.52) p=0.074]. The proportions of individuals who reported using aspirin at six months were: 10.2% (12/118) intervention vs 13.8% (16/116) control (estimated between-arm difference: -4.0% (95% CI: -13.5 to 5.5); [OR= 0.68 (97.5% CI:0.27 to 1.70), p= 0.692]. Conclusion The decision aid improved informed decision-making; but has little effect on long-term regular use of aspirin to reduce CRC risk.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBr J Gen Practen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by British Journal of General Practice.
dc.titleShould I Take Aspirin? (SITA): RCT of a decision aid for cancer chemoprevention.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/BJGP.2023.0385en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38527793en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-03-14en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record