Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEvans, JP
dc.contributor.authorEvans, JT
dc.contributor.authorMohammad, HR
dc.contributor.authorSayers, A
dc.contributor.authorBlom, AW
dc.contributor.authorWhitehouse, MR
dc.contributor.authorRees, JL
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T14:20:37Z
dc.date.available2023-12-19T14:20:37Z
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/93091
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Background and purpose: This study aims to determine, for the first time, generalizable data on the longevity and long-term function of elbow replacements.Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles reporting 10-year or greater survival of total elbow replacements (TERs) and distal humeral hemiarthroplasty. Implant survival and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) data were extracted. National joint replacement registries were also analyzed. We weighted each series and calculated a pooled survival estimate at 10, 15, and 20 years. For PROMs we pooled the standardized mean difference (SMD) at 10 years.Findings: Despite its widespread use, we identified only 9 series reporting all-cause survival of 628 linked TERs and 610 unlinked TERs and no series for distal humeral hemiarthroplasty. The studied population was treated for rheumatoid arthritis in over 90% of cases. The estimated 10-year survival for linked TERs was 92% (95% CI 90–95) and unlinked TERs 84% (CI 81–88). 2 independent registries contributed 32 linked TERs and 530 unlinked TERs. The pooled registry 10-year survival for unlinked TERs was 86% (CI 83–89). Pooled 10-year PROMs from 164 TERs (33 linked and 131 unlinked), revealed a substantial improvement from baseline scores (SMD 2.7 [CI 1.6–3.8]).Interpretation: Over 80% of all elbow replacements and over 90% of linked elbow replacements can last more than 10 years with sustained patient-reported benefits. This information is long overdue and will be particularly useful to patients as well as healthcare providers.</jats:p>en_US
dc.format.extent495 - 502
dc.publisherMedical Journals Sweden ABen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Orthopaedica
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.titleHow long does an elbow replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-series and national registry reports with more than 10 years of follow-upen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2340/17453674.2022.2753
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2022.2753en_US
pubs.volume93en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States