dc.contributor.author | Loft, P | |
dc.contributor.author | He, Y | |
dc.contributor.author | Janicke, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Wagner, I | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-19T12:06:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-19T12:06:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-21 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1751-7575 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/93055 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many organizations suffer serious information security incidents, despite having taken positive steps towards achieving good security standards. The authors hypothesize that these issues are often as a result of security arrangements not being sufficiently integrated with businesses. We believe that adopting an enterprise architecture (EA) approach to implementing information security – commonly referred to as an ‘Enterprise Information Security Architecture’ (EISA) – will deliver substantial benefits. Our paper has reviewed and analyzed literature concerning the root causes of information security incidents and describes a novel approach with 8 domains for ensuring critical factors are considered when building an EISA framework. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 448 - 473 | |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Enterprise Information Systems | |
dc.rights | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version accepted for publication in Enterprise Information Systems following peer review. The version of record is available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17517575.2019.1605000 | |
dc.title | Dying of a hundred good symptoms: why good security can still fail - a literature review and analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2019, Taylor & Francis | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17517575.2019.1605000 | |
pubs.issue | 4 | en_US |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
pubs.volume | 15 | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |