Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohammad, HRen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatharu, GSen_US
dc.contributor.authorJudge, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorMurray, DWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-19T11:58:55Z
dc.date.available2020-07-13en_US
dc.date.available2023-12-19T11:58:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/93048
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an alternative to total knee replacement for isolated lateral unicompartmental knee arthritis. The geometry and mechanics of the lateral compartment differ to the medial compartment with the Lateral Domed Oxford UKR designed to address this. We used the National Joint Registry (NJR) data to report the mid- to long-term outcomes of this device. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study using NJR data on 992 Lateral Domed Oxford UKRs implanted between 1st January 2005 and 31st December 2017. Outcomes of interest were implant survival and revision indications. RESULTS: The 10 year cumulative implant survival rates were 88.6% (CI 85.3-91.2). When compared with <55 year age group, the 55-64, 65-74 and ≥75 groups had significantly lower revision rates (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56 (CI 0.32-0.98, P = .04), HR 0.40 (CI 0.22-0.72, P = .003), and HR 0.27 (CI 0.12-0.58, P = .001), respectively). The obese group had significantly (P = .04) increased revision risk compared with normal BMI (HR 2.33, CI 1.06-5.12). The commonest reasons for revision surgery were dislocation (n = 23, 2.3%), pain (n = 15, 1.5%), and aseptic loosening (n = 14, 1.4%). CONCLUSION: The Lateral Domed Oxford UKR provides a good option for isolated lateral compartment osteoarthritis. However, dislocation of the mobile bearing remains a problem, occurring in 2.3% of the patients and accounting for 30% of the revisions. To help prevent dislocation, it is now possible to assess bearing stability intraoperatively and if very unstable to implant a compatible fixed bearing tibial component, without the need for further bone preparation.en_US
dc.format.extent107 - 111en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJ Arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectageen_US
dc.subjectbody mass indexen_US
dc.subjectdomeden_US
dc.subjectlateralen_US
dc.subjectlong term outcomesen_US
dc.subjectoxford UKRen_US
dc.subjectArthroplasty, Replacement, Kneeen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectKnee Prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectNorthern Irelanden_US
dc.subjectOsteoarthritis, Kneeen_US
dc.subjectProsthesis Failureen_US
dc.subjectRegistriesen_US
dc.subjectReoperationen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectWalesen_US
dc.titleThe Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of the Lateral Domed Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: An Analysis From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.031en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32773270en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume36en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-07-13en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record