Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaas, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorFarjat, AEen_US
dc.contributor.authorPieper, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorAgeno, Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorAngchaisuksiri, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorBounameaux, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldhaber, SZen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoto, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMantovani, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorPrandoni, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchellong, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorTurpie, AGGen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeitz, JIen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacCallum, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorCate, HTen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanchenko, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorCarrier, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorJerjes-Sanchez, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorJansky, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorKayani, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorKakkar, AKen_US
dc.contributor.authorGARFIELD-VTE investigatorsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-30T12:15:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-29en_US
dc.date.issued2022-10en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/84105
dc.description.abstractBackground  Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide a safe, effective alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment, as shown via intention-to-treat comparative effectiveness analysis. However, on-treatment analysis is imperative in observational studies because anticoagulation choice and duration are at investigators' discretion. Objectives  The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of DOACs and VKAs on 12-month outcomes in VTE patients using on-treatment analysis. Methods  The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD - VTE (GARFIELD-VTE) is a world-wide, prospective, non-interventional study observing treatment of VTE in routine clinical practice. Results  In total, 8,034 patients received VKAs ( n  = 3,043, 37.9%) or DOACs ( n  = 4,991, 62.1%). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and follow-up bleeding events, and accounting for possible time-varying confounding, all-cause mortality was significantly lower with DOACs than VKAs (hazard ratio: 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.42-0.79]). Furthermore, patients receiving VKAs were more likely to die of VTE complications (4.9 vs. 2.2%) or bleeding (4.9 vs. 0.0%). There was no significant difference in rates of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio: 0.74 [0.55-1.01]), major bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.76 [0.47-1.24]), or overall bleeding (hazard ratio: 0.87 [0.72-1.05]) with DOACs or VKAs. Unadjusted analyses suggested that VKA patients with active cancer or renal insufficiency were more likely to die than patients treated with DOAC (52.51 [37.33-73.86] vs. 26.52 [19.37-36.29] and 9.97 [7.51-13.23] vs. 4.70 [3.25-6.81] per 100 person-years, respectively). Conclusion  DOACs and VKAs had similar rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding. However, DOACs were associated with reduced all-cause mortality and a lower likelihood of death from VTE or bleeding compared with VKAs.en_US
dc.format.extente354 - e364en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTH Openen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectanticoagulationen_US
dc.subjectdirect oral anticoagulantsen_US
dc.subjecton-treatment comparative effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectvenous thromboembolismen_US
dc.subjectvitamin K antagonistsen_US
dc.titleOn-treatment Comparative Effectiveness of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants in GARFIELD-VTE, and Focus on Cancer and Renal Disease.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0042-1757744en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36452204en_US
pubs.issue4en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume6en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-08-29en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States