dc.contributor.author | Doshmangir, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Pourasghar, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Sharghi, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Rezapour, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Gordeev, VS | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-09T14:45:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-09T14:45:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Doshmangir, L., Pourasghar, F., Sharghi, R. et al. Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography. BMC Public Health 21, 1997 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2458 | |
dc.identifier.other | 1997 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/75117 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Effective waiting list management and comprehensive prioritisation can provide timely delivery of
appropriate services to ensure that the patient needs are met and increase equity in the provision of health
services. We developed a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography (CAA).
Methods: We used a multi-methods approach to elicit effective factors that affect CAA patient prioritisation.
Qualitative data wase collected using semi-structured interviews with 15 experts. The final set of factors was
selected using experts’ consensus through modifed Delphi technique. The framework was finalised during expert
panel meetings.
Results: 212 effective factors were identified based on the literature review, interviews, and expert panel discussion
of them, 37 factors were selected for modifed Delphi study. Following two rounds of Delphi discussions, seven final
factors were selected and weighed by ten experts using pair-wise comparisons. The following weights were given:
the severity of pain and symptoms (0.22), stress testing (0.18), background diseases (0.15), number of myocardial
infarctions (0.15), waiting time (0.10), reduction of economic and social performance (0.12), and special conditions
(0.08).
Conclusion: Clinical effective factors were important for CAA prioritisation framework. Using this framework can
potentially lead to improved accountability and justice in the health system. | en_US |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Public Health | |
dc.rights | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. | |
dc.title | Developing a prioritisation framework for patients in need of coronary artery angiography | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © The Author(s). 2021 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7 | |
pubs.issue | 1 | en_US |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | en_US |
pubs.publisher-url | http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12088-7 | |
pubs.volume | 21 | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-10-25 | |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |