Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMadurasinghe, VW
dc.contributor.authorBower, P
dc.contributor.authorEldridge, S
dc.contributor.authorCollier, D
dc.contributor.authorGraffy, J
dc.contributor.authorTreweek, S
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, P
dc.contributor.authorParker, A
dc.contributor.authorRick, J
dc.contributor.authorSalisbury, C
dc.contributor.authorMan, MS
dc.contributor.authorTorgerson, D
dc.contributor.authorSheridan, R
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, F
dc.contributor.authorCockayne, S
dc.contributor.authorDack, C
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-14T13:00:08Z
dc.date.available2021-08-04
dc.date.available2021-10-14T13:00:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-23
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/74540
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The information given to people considering taking part in a trial needs to be easy to understand if those people are to become, and then remain, trial participants. However, there is a tension between providing comprehensive information and providing information that is comprehensible. User-testing is one method of developing better participant information, and there is evidence that user-tested information is better at informing participants about key issues relating to trials. However, it is not clear if user-testing also leads to changes in the rates of recruitment in trials, compared to standard trial information. As part of a programme of research, we embedded 'studies within a trial' (SWATs) across multiple ongoing trials to see if user-tested materials led to better rates of recruitment. METHODS: Seven 'host' trials included a SWAT evaluation and randomised their participants to receive routine information sheets generated by the research teams, or information sheets optimised through user-testing. We collected data on trial recruitment and analysed the results across these trials using random effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome defined as the proportion of participants randomised in a host trial following an invitation to take part. RESULTS: Six SWATs (n=27,805) provided data on recruitment. Optimised participant information sheets likely result in little or no difference in recruitment rates (7.2% versus 6.8%, pooled odds ratio = 1.03, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.19, p-value = 0.63, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Participant information sheets developed through user testing did not improve recruitment rates. The programme of work showed that co-ordinated testing of recruitment strategies using SWATs is feasible and can provide both definitive and timely evidence on the effectiveness of recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Healthlines Depression (ISRCTN14172341) Healthlines CVD (ISRCTN27508731) CASPER (ISRCTN02202951) ISDR (ISRCTN87561257) ECLS (NCT01925625) REFORM (ISRCTN68240461) HeLP Diabetes (ISRCTN02123133).en_US
dc.format.extent218 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Med
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectInformationen_US
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectRecruitmenten_US
dc.subjectResearch methodologyen_US
dc.subjectSWATsen_US
dc.subjectUser-testingen_US
dc.titleCan we achieve better recruitment by providing better information? Meta-analysis of 'studies within a trial' (SWATs) of optimised participant information sheets.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12916-021-02086-2
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551765en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume19en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-04
qmul.funderSystematic Techniques for Assessing Recruitment to Trials (START): a programme to test recruitment interventions::Medical Research Councilen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States