Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFenton, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorNeil, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T13:01:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-09en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/73479
dc.description27 pages, 12 figuresen_US
dc.description27 pages, 12 figuresen_US
dc.description.abstractWhen presenting forensic evidence, such as a DNA match, experts often use the Likelihood ratio (LR) to explain the impact of evidence . The LR measures the probative value of the evidence with respect to a single hypothesis such as 'DNA comes from the suspect', and is defined as the probability of the evidence if the hypothesis is true divided by the probability of the evidence if the hypothesis is false. The LR is a valid measure of probative value because, by Bayes Theorem, the higher the LR is, the more our belief in the probability the hypothesis is true increases after observing the evidence. The LR is popular because it measures the probative value of evidence without having to make any explicit assumptions about the prior probability of the hypothesis. However, whereas the LR can in principle be easily calculated for a distinct single piece of evidence that relates directly to a specific hypothesis, in most realistic situations 'the evidence' is made up of multiple dependent components that impact multiple different hypotheses. In such situations the LR cannot be calculated . However, once the multiple pieces of evidence and hypotheses are modelled as a causal Bayesian network (BN), any relevant LR can be automatically derived using any BN software application.en_US
dc.subjectstat.APen_US
dc.subjectstat.APen_US
dc.titleCalculating the Likelihood Ratio for Multiple Pieces of Evidenceen_US
dc.typeArticle
pubs.author-urlhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05328v1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record