Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalim, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorShabani, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeven, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorRahman, QS-Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorKc, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorShamba, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorRuysen, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorRahman, AEen_US
dc.contributor.authorKc, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorMkopi, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorZaman, SBen_US
dc.contributor.authorShirima, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorAmeen, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorKong, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBasnet, Oen_US
dc.contributor.authorManji, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorKabuteni, TJen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrotherton, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoxon, SGen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmouzou, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorHailegebriel, TDen_US
dc.contributor.authorDay, LTen_US
dc.contributor.authorLawn, JEen_US
dc.contributor.authorEN-BIRTH Study Groupen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-30T14:51:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-26en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/73330
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) reduces mortality among stable neonates ≤2000 g. Lack of data tracking coverage and quality of KMC in both surveys and routine information systems impedes scale-up. This paper evaluates KMC measurement as part of the Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study. METHODS: The EN-BIRTH observational mixed-methods study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal and Tanzania from 2017 to 2018. Clinical observers collected time-stamped data as gold standard for mother-baby pairs in KMC wards/corners. To assess accuracy, we compared routine register-recorded and women's exit survey-reported coverage to observed data, using different recommended denominator options (≤2000 g and ≤ 2499 g). We analysed gaps in quality of provision and experience of KMC. In the Tanzanian hospitals, we assessed daily skin-to-skin duration/dose and feeding frequency. Qualitative data were collected from health workers and data collectors regarding barriers and enablers to routine register design, filling and use. RESULTS: Among 840 mother-baby pairs, compared to observed 100% coverage, both exit-survey reported (99.9%) and register-recorded coverage (92.9%) were highly valid measures with high sensitivity. KMC specific registers outperformed general registers. Enablers to register recording included perceptions of data usefulness, while barriers included duplication of data elements and overburdened health workers. Gaps in KMC quality were identified for position components including wearing a hat. In Temeke Tanzania, 10.6% of babies received daily KMC skin-to-skin duration/dose of ≥20 h and a further 75.3% received 12-19 h. Regular feeding ≥8 times/day was observed for 36.5% babies in Temeke Tanzania and 14.6% in Muhimbili Tanzania. Cup-feeding was the predominant assisted feeding method. Family support during admission was variable, grandmothers co-provided KMC more often in Bangladesh. No facility arrangements for other family members were reported by 45% of women at exit survey. CONCLUSIONS: Routine hospital KMC register data have potential to track coverage from hospital KMC wards/corners. Women accurately reported KMC at exit survey and evaluation for population-based surveys could be considered. Measurement of content, quality and experience of KMC need consensus on definitions. Prioritising further KMC measurement research is important so that high quality data can be used to accelerate scale-up of high impact care for the most vulnerable.en_US
dc.format.extent231 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Pregnancy Childbirthen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBirthen_US
dc.subjectCoverageen_US
dc.subjectHealth management systemsen_US
dc.subjectHospital recordsen_US
dc.subjectKangaroo mother careen_US
dc.subjectMaternalen_US
dc.subjectNewbornen_US
dc.subjectPretermen_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectBangladeshen_US
dc.subjectData Accuracyen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGestational Ageen_US
dc.subjectHospitalizationen_US
dc.subjectHospitalsen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectInfanten_US
dc.subjectInfant, Low Birth Weighten_US
dc.subjectInfant, Newbornen_US
dc.subjectIntensive Care Units, Neonatalen_US
dc.subjectKangaroo-Mother Care Methoden_US
dc.subjectNepalen_US
dc.subjectPerinatal Mortalityen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectRegistriesen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen_US
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen_US
dc.subjectTanzaniaen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleKangaroo mother care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). 2021
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12884-020-03423-8en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33765950en_US
pubs.issueSuppl 1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume21en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License