Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaake, J-Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorVulkan, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorQuaife, SLen_US
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, WTen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorWaller, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorParmar, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorSasieni, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, SWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T13:31:15Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05en_US
dc.date.issued2021-05en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/71602
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: For some common cancers, survival is lower in the UK than in comparable high-income countries. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of a targeted postal intervention (to promote awareness of cancer symptoms and earlier help seeking) on patient consultation rates. DESIGN AND SETTING: A two-arm randomised controlled trial was carried out on patients aged 50-84 years registered at 23 general practices in rural and urban areas of Greater London, Greater Manchester, and the North East of England. METHOD: Patients who had not had a consultation at their general practice in the previous 12 months and had at least two other risk factors for late presentation with cancer were randomised to intervention and control arms. The intervention consisted of a posted letter and leaflet. Primary outcome was the number of consultations at the practice with patients randomised to each arm in the 6 months subsequent to posting the intervention. All patients with outcome data were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: In total, 1513 patients were individually randomised to the intervention (n = 783) and control (n = 730) arms between Nov 2016 - May 2017; outcome data were available for 749 and 705 patients, respectively, with a statistically significantly higher rate of consultation in the intervention arm compared with the control arm: 436 versus 335 consultations (relative risk 1.40, 95% confidence interval = 1.11 to 1.77, P = 0.004). There was, however, no difference in the numbers of patients consulting. CONCLUSION: Targeted interventions of this nature can change behaviour; there is a need to develop interventions that can be more effective at engaging patients with primary care. This study demonstrates that targeted interventions promoting both awareness of possible cancer symptoms and earlier health seeking, can change behaviour. There is a need to develop and test interventions that can be more effective at engaging the most at-risk patients.en_US
dc.format.extente339 - e346en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBr J Gen Practen_US
dc.rightsThis article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence
dc.subjectcanceren_US
dc.subjectdiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectgeneral practiceen_US
dc.subjecthealth promotionen_US
dc.subjectprimary health careen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.titleTargeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: a randomised controlled trial.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp20X713489en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875418en_US
pubs.issue706en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume71en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-05en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record