Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCross, AJ
dc.contributor.authorRobbins, EC
dc.contributor.authorPack, K
dc.contributor.authorStenson, I
dc.contributor.authorPatel, B
dc.contributor.authorRutter, MD
dc.contributor.authorVeitch, AM
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, BP
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, SW
dc.contributor.authorWooldrage, K
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T13:15:54Z
dc.date.available2021-01-01
dc.date.available2021-04-20T13:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-05
dc.identifier.citationCross AJ, Robbins EC, Pack K, et al. Colorectal cancer risk following polypectomy in a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study: an evaluation of the 2020 UK post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines. Gut Published Online First: 05 March 2021. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323411en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/71385
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy surveillance aims to reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence after polypectomy. The 2020 UK guidelines recommend surveillance at 3 years for 'high-risk' patients with ≥2 premalignant polyps (PMPs), of which ≥1 is 'advanced' (serrated polyp (or adenoma) ≥10 mm or with (high-grade) dysplasia); ≥5 PMPs; or ≥1 non-pedunculated polyp ≥20 mm; 'low-risk' patients without these findings are instead encouraged to participate in population-based CRC screening. We examined the appropriateness of these risk classification criteria and recommendations. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent colonoscopy and polypectomy mostly between 2000 and 2010 at 17 UK hospitals, followed-up through 2017. We examined CRC incidence by baseline characteristics, risk group and number of surveillance visits using Cox regression, and compared incidence with that in the general population using standardised incidence ratios (SIRs). RESULTS: Among 21 318 patients, 368 CRCs occurred during follow-up (median: 10.1 years). Baseline CRC risk factors included age ≥55 years, ≥2 PMPs, adenomas with tubulovillous/villous/unknown histology or high-grade dysplasia, proximal polyps and a baseline visit spanning 2-90 days. Compared with the general population, CRC incidence without surveillance was higher among those with adenomas with high-grade dysplasia (SIR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.42) or ≥2 PMPs, of which ≥1 was advanced (1.39, 1.09 to 1.75). For low-risk (71%) and high-risk (29%) patients, SIRs without surveillance were 0.75 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.88) and 1.30 (1.03 to 1.62), respectively; for high-risk patients after first surveillance, the SIR was 1.22 (0.91 to 1.60). CONCLUSION: These guidelines accurately classify post-polypectomy patients into those at high risk, for whom one surveillance colonoscopy appears appropriate, and those at low risk who can be managed by non-invasive screening.en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGut
dc.subjectcolonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectcolorectal adenomasen_US
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren_US
dc.subjectcolorectal cancer screeningen_US
dc.subjectsurveillanceen_US
dc.titleColorectal cancer risk following polypectomy in a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study: an evaluation of the 2020 UK post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323411
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33674342en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-01
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record