Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuus, R
dc.contributor.authorSzijgyarto, Z
dc.contributor.authorSchuster, EF
dc.contributor.authorXiao, H
dc.contributor.authorHaynes, BP
dc.contributor.authorSestak, I
dc.contributor.authorCuzick, J
dc.contributor.authorParé, L
dc.contributor.authorSeguí, E
dc.contributor.authorChic, N
dc.contributor.authorPrat, A
dc.contributor.authorDowsett, M
dc.contributor.authorCheang, MCU
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T15:21:13Z
dc.date.available2020-12-17
dc.date.available2021-03-08T15:21:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-12
dc.identifier.citationBuus, R., Szijgyarto, Z., Schuster, E.F. et al. Development and validation for research assessment of Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score, EndoPredict® and Prosigna®. npj Breast Cancer 7, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00216-wen_US
dc.identifier.issn2374-4677
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/70628
dc.description.abstractMulti-gene prognostic signatures including the Oncotype® DX Recurrence Score (RS), EndoPredict® (EP) and Prosigna® (Risk Of Recurrence, ROR) are widely used to predict the likelihood of distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative breast cancer. Here, we describe the development and validation of methods to recapitulate RS, EP and ROR scores from NanoString expression data. RNA was available from 107 tumours from postmenopausal women with early-stage, ER+, HER2- breast cancer from the translational Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination study (TransATAC) where previously these signatures had been assessed with commercial methodology. Gene expression was measured using NanoString nCounter. For RS and EP, conversion factors to adjust for cross-platform variation were estimated using linear regression. For ROR, the steps to perform subgroup-specific normalisation of the gene expression data and calibration factors to calculate the 46-gene ROR score were assessed and verified. Training with bootstrapping (n = 59) was followed by validation (n = 48) using adjusted, research use only (RUO) NanoString-based algorithms. In the validation set, there was excellent concordance between the RUO scores and their commercial counterparts (rc(RS) = 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.97 with level of agreement (LoA) of -7.69 to 8.12; rc(EP) = 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98 with LoA of -0.64 to 1.26 and rc(ROR) = 0.97 (95% CI 0.94-0.98) with LoA of -8.65 to 10.54). There was also a strong agreement in risk stratification: (RS: κ = 0.86, p < 0.0001; EP: κ = 0.87, p < 0.0001; ROR: κ = 0.92, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the calibrated algorithms recapitulate the commercial RS and EP scores on individual biopsies and ROR scores on samples based on subgroup-centreing method using NanoString expression data.en_US
dc.format.extent15 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherNature Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNPJ Breast Cancer
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleDevelopment and validation for research assessment of Oncotype DX® Breast Recurrence Score, EndoPredict® and Prosigna®.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2021
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41523-021-00216-w
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33579961en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41523-021-00216-w
pubs.volume7en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-17
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
qmul.funderCancer Prevention programme grant::Cancer Research UKen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License