Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkuze, J
dc.contributor.authorCousens, S
dc.contributor.authorLawn, JE
dc.contributor.authorWaiswa, P
dc.contributor.authorGordeev, VS
dc.contributor.authorArnold, F
dc.contributor.authorCroft, T
dc.contributor.authorBaschieri, A
dc.contributor.authorBlencowe, H
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T16:12:54Z
dc.date.available2021-02-22T16:12:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-08
dc.identifier.citationAkuze, J., Cousens, S., Lawn, J.E. et al. Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical review. Popul Health Metrics 19, 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/70453
dc.description.abstractBackground Worldwide, an estimated 5.1 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually, 98% in low- and middle-income countries. Limited coverage of civil and vital registration systems necessitates reliance on women’s retrospective reporting in household surveys for data on these deaths. The predominant platform, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), has evolved over the last 35 years and differs by country, yet no previous study has described these differences and the effects of these changes on stillbirth and neonatal death measurement. Methods We undertook a review of DHS model questionnaires, protocols and methodological reports from DHS-I to DHS-VII, focusing on the collection of information on stillbirth and neonatal deaths describing differences in approaches, questionnaires and geographic reach up to December 9, 2019. We analysed the resultant data, applied previously used data quality criteria including ratios of stillbirth rate (SBR) to neonatal mortality rate (NMR) and early NMR (ENMR) to NMR, comparing by country, over time and by DHS module. Results DHS has conducted >320 surveys in 90 countries since 1984. Two types of maternity history have been used: full birth history (FBH) and full pregnancy history (FPH). A FBH collecting information only on live births has been included in all model questionnaires to date, with data on stillbirths collected through a reproductive calendar (DHS II-VI) or using additional questions on non-live births (DHS-VII). FPH collecting information on all pregnancies including live births, miscarriages, abortions and stillbirths has been used in 17 countries. We found no evidence of variation in stillbirth data quality assessed by SBR:NMR over time for FBH surveys with reproductive calendar, some variation for surveys with FBH in DHS-VII and most variation among the surveys conducted with a FPH. ENMR:NMR ratio increased over time, which may reflect changes in data quality or real epidemiological change. Conclusion DHS remains the major data source for pregnancy outcomes worldwide. Although the DHS model questionnaire has evolved over the last three and half decades, more robust evidence is required concerning optimal methods to obtain accurate data on stillbirths and neonatal deaths through household surveys and also to develop and test standardised data quality criteria.en_US
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPopulation Health Metrics
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
dc.titleFour decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in Demographic and Health Surveys: historical reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). 2020
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0
pubs.issueS1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume19en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record