Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManchanda, R
dc.contributor.authorGaba, F
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T13:49:31Z
dc.date.available2020-11-21
dc.date.available2020-12-10T13:49:31Z
dc.identifier.issn0022-2593
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/69243
dc.description.abstractBackground: Acceptance of the role of the fallopian tube in “ovarian” carcinogenesis and the detrimental sequelae of surgical menopause in pre-menopausal women following risk-reducing-salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), has resulted in risk-reducing-early-salpingectomy with delayed-oophorectomy (RRESDO) being proposed as an attractive alternative risk-reducing strategy in women who decline/delay oophorectomy. We present the results of a qualitative-study evaluating the decision-making process amongst BRCA-carriers considering prophylactic-surgeries (RRSO/RRESDO) as part of the multicentre PROTECTOR-trial (ISRCTN:25173360). Methods: In-depth semi-structured 1:1 interviews conducted using a pre-developed topic-guide (development informed by literature review and expert consultation) until informational saturation reached. Wording and sequencing of questions were left open with probes used to elicit additional information. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, transcripts analysed using an inductive theoretical framework and data managed using NVIVO-v12. Results: Informational saturation was reached following twenty-four interviews. Seven interconnected themes integral to surgical decision-making were identified: fertility/menopause/cancer risk-reduction/surgical-choices/surgical-complications/sequence of ovarian-&-breast prophylactic-surgeries/support/satisfaction. Women for whom maximising ovarian-cancer risk-reduction was relatively more important than early-menopause/quality-of-life preferred RRSO, whereas those more concerned about detrimental impact of menopause chose RRESDO. Women managed in specialist familial-cancer clinic (FCC) settings compared to non-specialist settings felt they received better quality care, improved HRT-access and were more satisfied. Conclusion: Multiple contextual-factors (medical,physical,psychological,social) influence timing of risk-reducing surgeries. RRESDO offers women delaying/declining premenopausal-oophorectomy, particularly those concerned about menopausal effects, a degree of ovarian-cancer risk-reduction whilst avoiding early-menopause. Care of high-risk women should be centralised to centres with specialist familial gynaecological cancer risk management services to provide a better quality, streamlined, holistic multidisciplinary approach.en_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Genetics
dc.rightsRe-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
dc.titleSurgical decision making in premenopausal BRCA carriers considering risk reducing early-salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy: a Qualitative Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021.
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-21
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record