Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShavadia, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorWelsh, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorGershlick, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Yen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuber, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsen, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteg, PGen_US
dc.contributor.authorVan de Werf, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, PWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-29T14:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/65903
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The effectiveness of radial access (RA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been predominantly established in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with limited exploration of this issue in the early postfibrinolytic patient. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of RA versus femoral (FA) access in STEMI undergoing either a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy or pPCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM), we evaluated the relationship between arterial access site and primary outcome (30-day composite of death, shock, congestive heart failure, or reinfarction) and major bleeding according to the treatment strategy received. A total of 1820 STEMI patients were included: 895 PI (49.2%; rescue PCI [n=379; 42.3%], scheduled PCI [n=516; 57.7%]) and 925 pPCI (50.8%). Irrespective of treatment strategy, there was comparable utilization of either access site (FA: PI 53.4% and pPCI 57.6%). FA STEMI patients were younger, had lower presenting systolic blood pressure, lesser Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk, and more ∑ST-elevation at baseline. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 8.9% RA versus 15.7% FA patients (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, this benefit on the primary composite outcome favoring RA persisted (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.78; P<0.001) and was evident in both pPCI (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.92) and PI cohorts (adjusted OR, 0.57 95% CI, 0.37-0.86; P interaction=0.730). There was no difference in nonintracranial major bleeding with either access group (RA vs FA, 5.2% vs 6.0%; P=0.489). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the application of a PI or pPCI strategy, RA was associated with improved clinical outcomes, supporting current STEMI evidence in favor of RA in PCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00623623.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJ Am Heart Assocen_US
dc.subjectST‐segment elevation myocardial infarctionen_US
dc.subjectarterial accessen_US
dc.subjectpharmacoinvasive strategyen_US
dc.subjectprimary percutaneous coronary interventionen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAspirinen_US
dc.subjectCatheterization, Peripheralen_US
dc.subjectClopidogrelen_US
dc.subjectCoronary Angiographyen_US
dc.subjectEnoxaparinen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFemoral Arteryen_US
dc.subjectFibrinolytic Agentsen_US
dc.subjectHeart Failureen_US
dc.subjectHemorrhageen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectMultivariate Analysisen_US
dc.subjectOdds Ratioen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Coronary Interventionen_US
dc.subjectPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsen_US
dc.subjectRadial Arteryen_US
dc.subjectRecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectST Elevation Myocardial Infarctionen_US
dc.subjectShocken_US
dc.subjectTenecteplaseen_US
dc.subjectThrombolytic Therapyen_US
dc.subjectTiclopidineen_US
dc.subjectTissue Plasminogen Activatoren_US
dc.titleRelationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/JAHA.116.003559en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28525886en_US
pubs.issue6en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume5en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record