Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWald, DS
dc.contributor.authorCasey-Gillman, O
dc.contributor.authorComer, K
dc.contributor.authorMansell, JS
dc.contributor.authorTeo, H
dc.contributor.authorMouyis, K
dc.contributor.authorKelham, M
dc.contributor.authorChan, F
dc.contributor.authorAhmet, S
dc.contributor.authorSayers, M
dc.contributor.authorMcCaughan, V
dc.contributor.authorPolenio, N
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T11:10:49Z
dc.date.available2020-02-11
dc.date.available2020-07-01T11:10:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-10
dc.identifier.citationWald DS, Casey-Gillman O, Comer K, et alAnimation-supported consent for urgent angiography and angioplasty: a service improvement initiativeHeart Published Online First: 10 March 2020. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316227en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/65365
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Patient understanding of angiography and angioplasty is often incomplete at the time of consent. Language barriers and time constraints are significant obstacles, particularly in the urgent setting. We introduced digital animations to support consent and assessed the effect on patient understanding. METHODS: Multi-language animations explaining angiography and angioplasty (www.explainmyprocedure.com/heart) were introduced at nine district hospitals for patients with acute coronary syndrome before urgent transfer to a cardiac centre for their procedure. Reported understanding of the reason for transfer, the procedure, its benefits and risks in 100 consecutive patients were recorded before introduction of the animations into practice (no animation group) and in 100 consecutive patients after their introduction (animation group). Patient understanding in the two groups was compared. RESULTS: Following introduction, 83/100 patients reported they had watched the animation before inter-hospital transfer (3 declined and 14 were overlooked). The proportions of patients who understood the reason for transfer, the procedure, its benefits and risks in the no animation group were 58%, 38%, 25% and 7% and in the animation group, 85%, 81%, 73% and 61%, respectively. The relative improvement (ratio of proportions) was 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.8), 2.1 (1.6 to 2.8), 2.9 (2.0 to 4.2) and 8.7 (4.2 to 18.1), respectively (p<0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Use of animations explaining angiography and angioplasty is feasible before urgent inter-hospital transfer and was associated with substantial improvement in reported understanding of the procedure, its risks and its benefits. The approach is not limited to cardiology and has the potential to be applied to all specialties in medicine.en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHeart
dc.rightsCC BY
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectacute coronary syndromeen_US
dc.subjectangiographyen_US
dc.subjectangioplastyen_US
dc.subjectanimationen_US
dc.subjectconsenten_US
dc.titleAnimation-supported consent for urgent angiography and angioplasty: a service improvement initiative.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316227
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32156717en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-02-10
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY