Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDearing, JA
dc.contributor.authorZhang, K
dc.contributor.authorCao, W
dc.contributor.authorDawson, TP
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, DA
dc.contributor.authorSillitoe, P
dc.contributor.authorTreves, R
dc.contributor.authorYang, X
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T13:58:51Z
dc.date.available2020-05-05T13:58:51Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-19
dc.identifier.citationDearing, J.A., Zhang, K., Weidong, C., Dawson, T.P., Mackay, D.A., Sillitoe, P., Treves, R. and Xiangdong, Y. 2019. Who determines the trade-offs between agricultural production and environmental quality? An evolutionary perspective from rural eastern China. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability Volume 17, (5), pp. 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1667141en_US
dc.identifier.issn1473-5903
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/63944
dc.description.abstractWe explore the evolutionary nature of interactions between government policy, farm decision-making and ecosystem services in Shucheng County, Anhui Province, 1950–2015. Analyses of ecological, social and economic trends are complemented by interviews with local farmers. Since the Household Responsibility System started in 1980, there has been a trade-off between rising levels of provisioning services and falling levels of regulating services with evidence that critical thresholds have been passed for water quality. Using a Framework for Ecosystem Service Provision, we argue that farmers have acted only as ecosystem service providers and have not influenced the policies that have brought about the trade-offs. Over the period, ecological degradation is best described as an example of ‘creeping normalcy’ where cumulative conventional actions by individual farmers produce unsustainable losses in regulating services. The Chinese government should act to balance the various ecosystem services through valuation and national policy. In this respect, there is a need for agencies that can provide place-based advice to farmers that will allow them to maintain productivity levels while pursuing restorative actions. Even with new policies, the draw of urban employment, high production costs and an ageing population threaten the viability of farming in these marginal agricultural areas.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Natural Environment Research Council [grant number NE/I002960/1]; National Key Basic Research and Development Programme (CN) [grant number 2017YFA0605200].en_US
dc.format.extent347 - 366
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor& Francis Onlineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.subjectsocial-ecological systemsen_US
dc.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dc.subjectevolutionary frameworksen_US
dc.subjecttrade-offsen_US
dc.titleWho determines the trade-offs between agricultural production and environmental quality? An evolutionary perspective from rural eastern Chinaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder2019. Informa UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14735903.2019.1667141
pubs.author-urlhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000487116200001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=612ae0d773dcbdba3046f6df545e9f6aen_US
pubs.issue5en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume17en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record