Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArnadottir, SA
dc.contributor.authorBruce, J
dc.contributor.authorLall, R
dc.contributor.authorWithers, EJ
dc.contributor.authorUnderwood, M
dc.contributor.authorShaw, F
dc.contributor.authorSheridan, R
dc.contributor.authorHossain, A
dc.contributor.authorLamb, SE
dc.contributor.authorthe Pre-FIT Study Group
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-17T16:54:29Z
dc.date.available2019-12-30
dc.date.available2020-04-17T16:54:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-15
dc.identifier.citationArnadottir, S.A., Bruce, J., Lall, R. et al. The importance of different frailty domains in a population based sample in England. BMC Geriatr 20, 16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1411-9en_US
dc.identifier.other16
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/63623
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim was to estimate the prevalence of frailty and relative contribution of physical/balance, nutritive, cognitive and sensory frailty to important adverse health states (falls, physical activity levels, outdoor mobility, problems in self-care or usual activities, and lack of energy or accomplishment) in an English cohort by age and sex. Methods: Analysis of baseline data from a cohort of 9803 community-dwelling participants in a clinical trial. The sample was drawn from a random selection of all people aged 70 or more registered with 63 general practices across England. Data were collected by postal questionnaire. Frailty was measured with the Strawbridge questionnaire. We used cross sectional, multivariate logistic regression to estimate the association between frailty domains and known correlates and adjusted for age. Some models were stratified by sex. Results: Mean age of participants was 78 years (sd 5.7), range 70 to 101 and 47.5% (4653/9803) were men. The prevalence of overall frailty was 20.7% (2005/9671) and there was no difference in prevalence by sex (Odds Ratio 0.98; 95% Confidence Interval 0.89 to 1.08). Sensory frailty was the most common and this was reported by more men (1823/4586) than women (1469/5056; Odds Ratio for sensory frailty 0.62, 95% Confidence Interval 0.57 to 0.68). Men were less likely than women to have physical or nutritive frailty. Physical frailty had the strongest independent associations with adverse health states. However, sensory frailty was independently associated with falls, less frequent walking, problems in self-care and usual activities, lack of energy and accomplishment. Conclusions: Physical frailty was more strongly associated with adverse health states, but sensory frailty was much more common. The health gain from intervention for sensory frailty in England is likely to be substantial, particularly for older men. Sensory frailty should be explored further as an important target of intervention to improve health outcomes for older people both at clinical and population level. Trial registration: ISRCTN71002650. Keywords: Frailty, Aging, Population characteristics, Sensation, Hearing, Visionen_US
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Geriatrics
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleThe importance of different frailty domains in a population based sample in Englanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder(c) The Authors 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12877-019-1411-9
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume20en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-30
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License