Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, DAen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastle, EVen_US
dc.contributor.authorBeirne, A-Men_US
dc.contributor.authorRathod, KSen_US
dc.contributor.authorTreibel, TAen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuttmann, OPen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoon, JCen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, EJen_US
dc.contributor.authorBourantas, CVen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavies, LCen_US
dc.contributor.authorWragg, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorPugliese, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorMathur, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T16:17:02Z
dc.date.available2019-06-21en_US
dc.date.issued2020-02-07en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/61874
dc.description.abstractAIMS: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is more complex and challenging in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG). Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) may provide useful information prior to ICA to improve these procedures. This study aimed to see if upfront CTCA prior to coronary angiography can reduce contrast load, procedural duration, and procedural complications compared to ICA alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre observational study included 835 patients with prior CABG undergoing invasive coronary angiography. One hundred and six patients underwent CTCA prior to ICA and were compared to 729 patients undergoing conventional coronary angiography alone (control group). No significant differences were seen between the two groups in patient demographics and procedural characteristics (number of bypass grafts), and interventional cardiologists' experience. The CTCA group had lower contrast volumes (171.3 vs 287.4 ml, p<0.0001), radiation doses (effective dose 4.6 vs 10.5 mSv, p<0.0001) and procedure times (fluorosocopy time 9.5 vs 12.6 min, p<0.0001) at the time of ICA compared to patients who did not have prior CTCA. Combined radiation doses (ICA+CTCA) versus ICA alone were similar (p=0.867) with significant reductions in overall contrast used seen in the CTCA group (p=0.005). Complete diagnostic studies were performed in all patients with prior CTCA (106 patients, 100%) compared to 543 patients (74.64%, p=<0.0001) without previous CTCA. As a result, 34 patients (4.4%) went on to have CTCA post angiography due to missed grafts. Of these, four needed further invasive angiographic assessment and subsequent coronary intervention following the CTCA scan. CONCLUSIONS: Prior CTCA improves graft detection at the time of coronary angiography and reduces the time necessary to localise graft ostium, the total procedure time, and volume of contrast media used.en_US
dc.format.extente1351 - e1357en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuroInterventionen_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomography Angiographyen_US
dc.subjectCoronary Angiographyen_US
dc.subjectCoronary Artery Bypassen_US
dc.subjectCoronary Artery Diseaseen_US
dc.subjectHearten_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen_US
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computeden_US
dc.titleComputed tomography cardiac angiography for planning invasive angiographic procedures in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01185en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235457en_US
pubs.issue15en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume15en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record