Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHumphrey, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorPickering, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorNull, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorWinch, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorMangwadu, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorPrendergast, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorNjenga, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorNtozini, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorBenjamin-Chung, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuda, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorMoulton, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorColford, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuby, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-28T15:07:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-06en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/60761
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We recently completed 3 efficacy trials (Bangladesh, Kenya, Zimbabwe) testing the independent and combined effects of improved complementary feeding (CF) and intensive household water quality, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) on child diarrhea and length-for-age-Z-score (LAZ) at 18 to 24 mo. Intervention uptake was high. In all three trials: CF increased LAZ but WASH had no effect on LAZ. WASH reduced diarrhea in Bangladesh but not in Kenya or Zimbabwe. We present a synthesis of trial findings and their implications. Methods: Reviews of the literature and reanalyses of trial data were conducted. Results: WASH and stunting: Copious observational studies have demonstrated a strong association between household-level WASH and child LAZ. We conducted an observational anlaysis (nested birth cohort) from our control arms. In adjusted analyses of all three trials, having an improved latrine when the pregnant woman was enrolled was associated with ∼0.2LAZ increase in her child at 18-24 mo. The frequently reported association between household WASH indicators and child growth may be confounded and drawing causal inferance misguided.WASH and diarrhea: Promoters visited intervention households 6 times per month in Bangladesh and monthly in Kenya and Zimbabwe. We conducted a systematic literature review: virtually all evidence that household water chlorination and handwashing reduce diarrhea comes from studies with daily to fortnightly intervention contact. In studies with follow-up after the trial ending, behaviors steeply declined and the effect on child diarrhea disappeared. Household water chlorination and handwashing promotion implemented through sporadic message delivery may not reduce child diarrhea.Enteropathogen transmission: Despite achieving substantial contrast between WASH and non-WASH households, children in the WASH arms still experienced high enteropathogen transmission, illustrating the recalcitrance of pervasive fecal contamination in rural low-income communities to even intense intervention. Conclusions: Household WASH interventions are unlikely to reduce child stunting and may not reduce child diarrhea. We call for substantial investment in research to identify and in programming to deliver much more efficacious interventions. Funding Sources: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, USAID, DFID/UKAID, Wellcome Trust.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCurr Dev Nutren_US
dc.titleThe WASH Benefits and SHINE Trials. Interpretation of Findings on Linear Growth and Diarrhoea and Implications for Policy: Perspective of the Investigative Teams (P10-136-19).en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cdn/nzz034.P10-136-19en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31224648en_US
pubs.issueSuppl 1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume3en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record