Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurnside, ESen_US
dc.contributor.authorVulkan, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorBlanks, RGen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, SWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-25T18:53:44Z
dc.date.available2017-12-21en_US
dc.date.issued2018-07en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/58642
dc.description.abstractPurpose To determine whether low levels of recall lead to increased interval cancers and the magnitude of this effect. Materials and Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme during a 36-month period (April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2008), with 3-year follow-up in women aged 50-70 years. Data on recall, cancers detected at screening, and interval cancers were available for each of the 84 breast screening units and for each year (n = 252). The association between interval cancers and recalls was modeled by using Poisson regression on aggregated data and according to age (5-year intervals) and screening type (prevalent vs incident). Results The authors analyzed 5 126 689 screening episodes, demonstrating an average recall to assessment rate (RAR) of 4.56% (range, 1.64%-8.42%; standard deviation, 1.15%), cancer detection rate of 8.1 per 1000 women screened, and interval cancer rate (ICR) of 3.1 per 1000 women screened. Overall, a significant negative association was found between RAR and ICR (Poisson regression coefficient: -0.039 [95% confidence interval: -0.062, -0.017]; P = .001), with approximately one fewer interval cancer for every additional 80-84 recalls. Subgroup analysis revealed similar negative correlations in women aged 50-54 years (P = .002), 60-64 years (P = .01), and 65-69 years (P = .008) as well as in incident screens (P = .001) and prevalent screens (P = .04). No significant relationship was found in women aged 55-59 years (P = .46). Conclusion There was a statistically significant negative correlation between RAR and ICR, which suggests the merit of a minimum threshold for RAR. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.en_US
dc.format.extent47 - 54en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRadiologyen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)
dc.subjectAge Factorsen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectBreasten_US
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectCohort Studiesen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMammographyen_US
dc.subjectMass Screeningen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.titleAssociation between Screening Mammography Recall Rate and Interval Cancers in the UK Breast Cancer Service Screening Program: A Cohort Study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© RSNA, 2018
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.2018171539en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29613846en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume288en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record