Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLo, LLen_US
dc.contributor.authorCollins, IMen_US
dc.contributor.authorBressel, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorButow, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmery, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorKeogh, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorWeideman, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteel, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorHopper, JLen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrainer, AHen_US
dc.contributor.authorMann, GBen_US
dc.contributor.authorBickerstaffe, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, ACen_US
dc.contributor.authorCuzick, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, K-Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T12:46:58Z
dc.date.available2018-11-01en_US
dc.date.issued2018-11-07en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: iPrevent estimates breast cancer (BC) risk and provides tailored risk management information. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the usability and acceptability of the iPrevent prototype. METHODS: Clinicians were eligible for participation in the study if they worked in primary care, breast surgery, or genetics clinics. Female patients aged 18-70 years with no personal cancer history were eligible. Clinicians were first familiarized with iPrevent using hypothetical paper-based cases and then actor scenarios; subsequently, they used iPrevent with their patients. Clinicians and patients completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) and an Acceptability questionnaire 2 weeks after using iPrevent; patients also completed measures of BC worry, anxiety, risk perception, and knowledge pre- and 2 weeks post-iPrevent. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The SUS and Acceptability questionnaires were completed by 19 of 20 clinicians and 37 of 43 patients. Usability was above average (SUS score >68) for 68% (13/19) clinicians and 76% (28/37) patients. The amount of information provided by iPrevent was reported as "about right" by 89% (17/19) clinicians and 89% (33/37) patients and 95% (18/19) and 97% (36/37), respectively, would recommend iPrevent to others, although 53% (10/19) clinicians and 27% (10/37) patients found it too long. Exploratory analyses suggested that iPrevent could improve risk perception, decrease frequency of BC worry, and enhance BC prevention knowledge without changing state anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The iPrevent prototype demonstrated good usability and acceptability. Because concerns about length could be an implementation barrier, data entry has been abbreviated in the publicly available version of iPrevent.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC #1064244)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBreast Cancer Trials Australia & New Zealand Discretionary Funding (formerly Australia and New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group).en_US
dc.format.extente24 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJMIR Form Resen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectBRCA1 geneen_US
dc.subjectBRCA2 geneen_US
dc.subjectbreast canceren_US
dc.subjectclinical decision supporten_US
dc.subjectpreventive healthen_US
dc.subjectrisken_US
dc.subjectscreeningen_US
dc.titleThe iPrevent Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk Management Tool: Usability and Acceptability Testing.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder2018. The authors
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/formative.9935en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30684421en_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume2en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-25en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution License